Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30958101›Full record

ArticleJournal of health communication2019

Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening among Adults Who Have Never Been Screened: Testing the Interaction between Message Framing and Tailored Risk Feedback.

Isaac M Lipkus, Constance Johnson, Sathya Amarasekara, Wei Pan, John A Updegraff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health communication, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Effects of culturally targeted message framing on colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isaac M Lipkusa Duke University School of Nursing , Durham , NC USA.
Constance Johnsonb The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Cizik School of Nursing , Houston , TX , USA.
Sathya Amarasekaraa Duke University School of Nursing , Durham , NC USA.
Wei Pana Duke University School of Nursing , Durham , NC USA.
John A Updegraffc Department of Psychology , Kent University , OH , USA.

Funding

Effects of Message Framing and Risk Feedback on CRC ScreeningR21CA181256 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LIPKUS, ISAAC M · 2014 to 2015
$388k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA181256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing adults tailored risk estimates of getting colorectal cancer (CRC) can increase screening. A concern is that receipt of lower risk estimates will demotivate screening; this effect may be curbed by matching level of risk with message framing. Theoretically, pairing lower risk estimates with gain-frame messages, and higher risk estimates with loss-frame messages, should increase screening and screening intentions more than pairing lower risk estimates with loss-frame messages/higher risk estimates with gain-frame messages. These effects may be mediated by how screening is construed (e.g., to find health problems vs. to reaffirm one is healthy). These predictions were tested experimentally among 560 men and women ages 50-75 who have never screened. Participants at baseline received online a tailored comparative risk estimate with gain- or loss-frame information on screening. Screening was assessed six months later. Among the 400 reached at six months, 9.5% reported screening. There were no main effects or interactions between risk feedback and framing predicting construals, screening intentions, or screening. Worry about getting CRC and screening intentions predicted screening. While hypothesized interactions were not found, future research should explore further mechanisms through which online interventions utilizing risk feedback and framing motivate screening among adults who have never screened.

Indexed as

AgedColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHealth CommunicationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID30958101
PMCPMC6852613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.