Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30957936›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019

Task-based assessment of a convolutional neural network for segmenting breast lesions for radiomic analysis.

Karl D Spuhler, Jie Ding, Chunling Liu, Junqi Sun, Mario Serrano-Sosa, Meghan Moriarty, Chuan Huang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Survey of Convolutional Neural Network in Breast Cancer.Computer modeling in engineering & sciences : CMES · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis using deep learning-based features.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Application of radiomics and machine learning in head and neck cancers.International journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Karl D SpuhlerBiomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Jie DingBiomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Chunling LiuRadiology, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Junqi SunRadiology, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Mario Serrano-SosaBiomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Meghan MoriartyRadiology, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Chuan HuangBiomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-6052-0663
Stony Brook University · USStony Brook School · USGuangdong General Hospital · CNShantou University · CN

Funding

Early Treatment Response Detection Using Highly Accurate and Reliable Breast Density Measure Derived From MRIR03CA223052 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI HUANG, CHUAN · 2018 to 2019
$157k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA223052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadiomics allows for powerful data-mining and feature extraction techniques to guide clinical decision making. Image segmentation is a necessary step in such pipelines and different techniques can significantly affect results. We demonstrate that a convolutional neural network (CNN) segmentation method performs comparably to expert manual segmentations in an established radiomics pipeline.

methodsUsing the manual regions of interest (ROIs) of an expert radiologist (R1), a CNN was trained to segment breast lesions from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Following network training, we segmented lesions for the testing set of a previously established radiomics pipeline for predicting lymph node metastases using DCE-MRI of breast cancer. Prediction accuracy of CNN segmentations relative to manual segmentations by R1 from the original study, a resident (R2), and another expert radiologist (R3) were determined. We then retrained the CNN and radiomics model using R3's manual segmentations to determine the effects of different expert observers on end-to-end prediction.

resultsUsing R1's ROIs, the CNN achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.71 ± 0.16 in the testing set. When input to our previously published radiomics pipeline, these CNN segmentations achieved comparable prediction performance to R1's manual ROIs, and superior performance to those of the other radiologists. Similar results were seen when training the CNN and radiomics model using R3's ROIs.

conclusionA CNN architecture is able to provide DCE-MRI breast lesion segmentations which are suitable for input to our radiomics model. Moreover, the previously established radiomics model and CNN can be accurately trained end-to-end using ground truth data provided by distinct experts.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerBreastBreast NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiologistsautomated segmentationbreast cancerDCE-MRIdeep learningradiomics

Identifiers

PMID30957936
PMCPMC6510591
OpenAlexW2940302122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.