Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30957145›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2019

The Emerging Role of Biomarkers in Adaptive Modulation of Clinical Brain Stimulation.

Kimberly B Hoang, Dennis A Turner

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07671261 (Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Refractory Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07671261 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Refractory Schizophrenia: Individualized Target Selection and Efficacy

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2025 to 2028Enrolled46ConditionsSchizophrenia Disorders, Schizo Affective DisorderArmsSEEG implantation, Deep brain stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Construction of semi-supervised spatial projections to identify the source of beta- and high frequency oscillations in Parkinson's disease.International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Miniature Dual-Biomarker-Based Sensing and Conditioning Device for Closed-Loop DBS.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kimberly B HoangDepartment of Neurosurgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Dennis A TurnerDepartments of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Scalar Closed-Loop STN/GPi DBS Based on Evoked and Spontaneous PotentialsUH3NS103468 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI TURNER, DENNIS ALAN · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Recording Evoked Potentials for Closed-Loop DBSR01NS079312 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GRILL, WARREN M. · 2012 to 2014
$1.1M
Characterization of Evoked Potentials During Deep Brain StimulationF31NS070460 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KENT, ALEXANDER RAFAEL · 2010 to 2012
$87k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS070460NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS079312NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS103468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic brain stimulation has proven efficacious for treatment of nervous system diseases, exerting widespread influence via disease-specific neural networks. Activation or suppression of neural networks could theoretically be assessed by either clinical symptom modification (ie, tremor, rigidity, seizures) or development of specific biomarkers linked to treatment of symptomatic disease states. For example, biomarkers indicative of disease state could aid improved intraoperative localization of electrode position, optimize device efficacy or efficiency through dynamic control, and eventually serve to guide automatic adjustment of stimulation settings. Biomarkers to control either extracranial or intracranial stimulation span from continuous physiological brain activity, intermittent pathological activity, and triggered local phenomena or potentials, to wearable devices, blood flow, biochemical or cardiac signals, temperature perturbations, optical or magnetic resonance imaging changes, or optogenetic signals. The goal of this review is to update new approaches to implement control of stimulation through relevant biomarkers. Critical questions include whether adaptive systems adjusted through biomarkers can optimize efficiency and eventually efficacy, serve as inputs for stimulation adjustment, and consequently broaden our fundamental understanding of abnormal neural networks in pathologic states. Neurosurgeons are at the forefront of translating and developing biomarkers embedded within improved brain stimulation systems. Thus, criteria for developing and validating biomarkers for clinical use are important for the adaptation of device approaches into clinical practice.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBrainDeep Brain StimulationHumansBiomarkersAdaptive brain stimulationBeta hypersynchronyBiomarkersClosed loopDeep brain stimulationEpilepsyEvoked field potentialsParkinson diseasePhase amplitude coupling

Identifiers

PMID30957145
PMCPMC6695309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.