Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30957080›Full record

ReviewMedicine and pharmacy reports2019

The role of medical registries, potential applications and limitations.

Bogdan Pop, Bogdan Fetica, Mihaiela Luminita Blaga, Adrian Pavel Trifa, Patriciu Achimas-Cadariu, Catalin Ioan Vlad, Andrei Achimas-Cadariu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06380530 (Advanced Surgical Simulation Processes in the Correction of Skeletal Defects and Deformities), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06380530 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Advanced Surgical Simulation Processes in the Correction of Skeletal Defects and Deformities

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2024 to 2029Enrolled100ConditionsMusculoskeletal Deformity, Musculoskeletal Abnormalities, Musculoskeletal DisorderArmsDeformity correction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluating the Educational Value of Cancer Registries - a Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bogdan PopIuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Bogdan FeticaDepartment of Pathology, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mihaiela Luminita BlagaDepartment of Information Technology, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta" Oncology Institute, Cluj-Napoca Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Adrian Pavel TrifaDepartment of Medical Genetics, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Patriciu Achimas-CadariuDepartment of Surgical and Gynecological Oncology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Catalin Ioan VladDepartment of Surgical and Gynecological Oncology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Andrei Achimas-CadariuDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical registries provide highly reliable data, challenged hierarchically only by randomized controlled trials. Although registries have been used in several fields of medicine for more than a century and a half, their key role is frequently overlooked and poorly recognized. Medical registries have evolved from calculating basic epidemiological data (incidence, prevalence, mortality) to diverse applications in disease prevention, early diagnosis and screening programs, treatment response, health care planning, decision making and disease control programs. Implementing, maintaining and running a medical registry requires substantial effort. Developing the registry represents a complex task and is one of the major barriers in widespread use of registries. Medical registries have potential to evolve to a next generation by taking benefit from recent semantic web technology developments. This paper is aimed at providing a summary of the basic information available on medical registries and to highlight the progress and potential applications in this field.

Indexed as

data accuracyhealth carepublic healthquality assuranceregistriesregistries/standards

Identifiers

PMID30957080
PMCPMC6448488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.