Observational studyBJS open2019
National cohort study on postoperative risks after surgery for submucosal invasive colorectal cancer.
Observational study in BJS open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk assessment of lymph node metastasis and comparison of treatment modalities for low-risk T1b colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Additional staining for lymphovascular invasion is associated with increased estimation of lymph node metastasis in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Early Rectal Cancer: Diagnostic Challenges and the Role of Endoscopic Intermuscular Dissection Within the Therapeutic Algorithm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Using contrast-enhancing software to improve sentinel lymph node detection with indocyanine green in colon cancer surgery.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection Using the Full-Thickness Resection Device for Submucosal Invasive Colorectal Cancer: The First United States Multicenter Experience.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- [Technical advances in endoscopic resection : Potential, limits and the necessary interdisciplinary dialogue with surgery].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Guideline adherence in surgical decisions for T1 colorectal cancer after endoscopic resection: large language models vs clinicians.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Assessing the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in identifying early rectal cancers suitable for endoscopic intermuscular dissection.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Does Omitting Additional Surgery After Local Resection Affect Oncological Outcomes in Patients with High-Risk pT1 Colorectal Cancer?Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Pushing the Boundaries of Local Excision: How Does the Risk of Lymph Node Metastases Compare to Those Associated with Major Surgery in T2 Colon Cancer Patients?Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in T2 Colon Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- The Outcome of Colonoscopy-Assisted Laparoscopic Wedge Resections (CAL-WR) for Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- DNA methylation biomarkers for predicting lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Models May Aid in Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with T1 Colorectal Cancer.Gut and liver · 2025Article
- Deep learning for segmentation of colorectal carcinomas on endoscopic ultrasound.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Article
- Variation in the detection of lymphovascular invasion in T1 colorectal cancer and its impact on treatment: A nationwide Dutch study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Article
- The risk factors of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer: a predictive nomogram and risk assessment.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- How secure can we expect the surveillance policies to be after the implementation in T1 polyps with carcinoma?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
- Accuracy Goals in Predicting Preoperative Lymph Node Metastasis for T1 Colorectal Cancer Resected Endoscopically.Gut and liver · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The decision to perform surgery for patients with T1 colorectal cancer hinges on the estimated risk of lymph node metastasis, residual tumour and risks of surgery. The aim of this observational study was to compare surgical outcomes for T1 colorectal cancer with those for more advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: This was a population-based cohort study of patients treated surgically for pT1-3 colorectal cancer between 2009 and 2016, using data from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit. Postoperative complications (overall, surgical, severe complications and mortality) were compared using multivariable logistic regression. A risk stratification table was developed based on factors independently associated with severe complications (reintervention and/or mortality) after elective surgery. Results: Of 39 813 patients, 5170 had pT1 colorectal cancer. No statistically significant differences were observed between patients with pT1 and pT2-3 disease in the rate of severe complications (8·3 Conclusion: Elective bowel resection was associated with similar morbidity and mortality rates in patients with pT1 and those with pT2-3 colorectal carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.