Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30957052›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2019

Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders: Methodologies for Measurement of Enzymatic Activities in Dried Blood Spots.

Michael H Gelb, Zoltan Lukacs, Enzo Ranieri, Peter C J I Schielen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Progress of newborn screening in China.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Newborn Screening for Fabry Disease: Current Status of Knowledge.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cut-off values of neonatal lysosomal storage disease-related enzymes detected by tandem mass spectrometry.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael H GelbDepartments of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Zoltan LukacsNewborn Screening and Metabolic Diagnostics Unit, Hamburg University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Enzo RanieriHead Biochemical Genetics, Directorate of Genetics & Molecular Pathology, SAPathology at the Women's & Children's Hospital, South Australia.
Peter C J I SchielenHead Reference Laboratory for Neonatal Screening, Center for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), P. O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLSouth Australia Pathology · AUUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Multiplex Analysis of Inborn Errors of MetabolismR01DK067859 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GELB, MICHAEL H · 2003 to 2025
$9.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK067859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All worldwide newborn screening (NBS) for lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) is performed as a first-tier test by measurement of lysosomal enzymatic activities in dried blood spots (DBS). The currently two available methodologies used for measurement of enzymatic activities are tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and digital microfluidics fluorimetry (DMF-F). In this chapter we summarize the workflows for the two platforms. Neither platform is fully automated, but the relative ease of workflow will be dependent upon the specific operation of each newborn screening laboratory on a case-by-case basis. We provide the screen positive rate (the number of below cutoff newborns per 100,000 newborns) from all NBS laboratories worldwide carrying out MS/MS-based NBS of one or more LSDs. The analytical precision of the MS/MS method is higher than that for DMF-F as shown by analysis of a common set of quality control DBS by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Both the MS/MS and DMF-F platforms enable multiplexing of the LSD enzymes. An advantage of MS/MS over DMF-F is the ability to include assays of enzymatic activities and biomarkers for which no fluorimetric methods exist. Advantages of DMF-F over MS/MS are: 1) Simple to use technology with same-day turn-around time for the lysosomal enzymes with the fastest rates compared to MS/MS requiring overnight analytical runs.; 2) The DMF-F instrumentation, because of its simplicity, requires less maintenance than the MS/MS platform.

Indexed as

cutoff valuesdiagnosisdried blood spotsenzymatic activity assayslysosomal storage diseasesnewborn screeningtandem mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID30957052
PMCPMC6448570
OpenAlexW2905850519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.