Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30957004›Full record

ReviewEndoscopy international open2019

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus placebo for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Juan Pablo Román Serrano, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Tomazo Prince Franzini, Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi, Marianne Torrezan Salesse, Paulo Sakai, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux De Moura

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopy international open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. NSAIDs do not reduce severity among post-ERCP pancreatitis patients.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Incidence and Severity of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in Patients Receiving Standard Administration of NSAIDs: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy vs. conventional therapy for complex bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography a reliable procedure in advanced age? A single tertiary center experience.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan Pablo Román SerranoHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de MouraHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wanderley Marques BernardoHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Igor Braga RibeiroHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tomazo Prince FranziniHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de MouraHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vitor Ottoboni BrunaldiHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marianne Torrezan SalessePontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC/SP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo SakaiHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux De MouraHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID30957004
PMCPMC6445649
OpenAlexW2933878882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.