Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30956988›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2019

Comparison of the Intestinal Microbial Community in Ducks Reared Differently through High-Throughput Sequencing.

Yan Zhao, Kun Li, Houqiang Luo, Longchuan Duan, Caixia Wei, Meng Wang, Junjie Jin, Suzhen Liu, Khalid Mehmood, Muhammad Shahzad

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Black Soldier Fly (Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Using Extract From the Stems and Leaves of Yizhi (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Gut microbes
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yan ZhaoCollege of Animal Science, Wenzhou Vocational College of Science and Technology, Wenzhou 325006, China.
Kun LiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Houqiang LuoCollege of Animal Science, Wenzhou Vocational College of Science and Technology, Wenzhou 325006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2990-6012
Longchuan DuanCollege of Animal Science, Wenzhou Vocational College of Science and Technology, Wenzhou 325006, China.
Caixia WeiCollege of Animal Science, Wenzhou Vocational College of Science and Technology, Wenzhou 325006, China.
Meng WangCollege of Animal Science, Wenzhou Vocational College of Science and Technology, Wenzhou 325006, China.
Junjie JinCollege of Animal Science, Wenzhou Vocational College of Science and Technology, Wenzhou 325006, China.
Suzhen LiuCollege of Animal Science, Wenzhou Vocational College of Science and Technology, Wenzhou 325006, China.
Khalid MehmoodCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Muhammad ShahzadUniversity College of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan.
Wenzhou Vocational College of Science and Technology · CNIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birds are an important source of fecal contamination in environment. Many of diseases are spread through water contamination caused by poultry droppings. A study was conducted to compare the intestinal microbial structure of Shaoxing ducks with and without water. Thirty 1-day-old Shaoxing ducks (Qingke No. 3) were randomly divided into two groups; one group had free access to water (CC), while the other one was restricted from water (CT). After 8 months of breeding, caecal samples of 10 birds from each group were obtained on ice for high-throughput sequencing. A total of 1507978 valid sequences were examined and clustered into 1815 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). At phylum level, Firmicutes (41.37%), Bacteroidetes (33.26%), Proteobacteria (13.67%), and Actinobacteria (8.26%) were found to dominate the microbial community in CC birds, while Firmicutes (53.62%), Bacteroidetes (33.06%), and Actinobacteria (11.13%) were uncovered to be the prime phyla in CT ducks. At genus level, Bacteroides (25.02%), Escherichia-Shigella (11.02%), Peptococcus (7.73%) and Parabacteroides (5.86%) were revealed to be the mainly genera in the CC group ducks, while Bacteroides (18.11%), Erysipelatoclostridium (10.94%), Ruminococcaceae_unclassified (10.43%), Lachnospiraceae_unclassified (5.26%), Coriobacteriales_unclassified (5.89%), and Faecalibacterium (4.2%) were detected to staple the microbial flora in the CT birds. One phylum and 13 genera were found to have the significant difference between the two bird groups (p<0.05). At phylum level, Proteobacteria in CT ducks were found to be obviously lower than ducks in CC birds (p<0.05). At genus level, Escherichia-Shigella (p<0.05) and Peptococcus (p<0.05) were found to be notably lower in CT birds, while Erysipelatoclostridium (p<0.05), Ruminococcaceae_unclassified (p<0.01), Coriobacteriales_unclassified (p<0.05), Faecalibacterium (p<0.01), Atopobiaceae_unclassified (p<0.01), Alistipes (p<0.05), Eggerthellaceae_unclassified (p<0.05), Prevotella_7 (<0.05), Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group (p<0.05), Prevotellaceae_uncultured (p<0.05), and Shuttleworthia (p<0.05) were observed to be prominently higher in CT ducks. In conclusion, the present study revealed the effects of keeping ducks away from swimming with obvious changes in the microbial community. Though higher microbial richness was found in the ducks without swimming, more pathogenic genera including Eggerthella, Erysipelatoclostridium, Alistipes, Prevotella_7, and Shuttleworthia; zoonotic genera including Eggerthella and Shuttleworthia; inflammatory genus Alistipes; anti-inflammatory Faecalibacterium genus; and tumor genus Rikenellaceae were examined in these ducks. The CT ducks also showed significant changes at genera level regarding the metabolism (Peptococcus, Ruminococcaceae, and Coriobacteriales).

Indexed as

BacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsDucksFecesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID30956988
PMCPMC6431443
OpenAlexW2922064003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.