Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30956982›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2019

Genetic Modification for Wheat Improvement: From Transgenesis to Genome Editing.

Nikolai Borisjuk, Olena Kishchenko, Serik Eliby, Carly Schramm, Peter Anderson, Satyvaldy Jatayev, Akhylbek Kurishbayev, Yuri Shavrukov

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Genetic Transformation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Regulation of root growth and elongation in wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Protein Biofortification in Lentils (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  19. EMS Derived Wheat Mutant BIG8-1 (International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Biofortification and bioavailability of Zn, Fe and Se in wheat: present status and future prospects.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Nikolai BorisjukSchool of Life Science, Huaiyin Normal University, Huaian, China.
Olena KishchenkoSchool of Life Science, Huaiyin Normal University, Huaian, China.
Serik ElibyCollege of Science and Engineering, Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Carly SchrammCollege of Science and Engineering, Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Peter AndersonCollege of Science and Engineering, Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Satyvaldy JatayevFaculty of Agronomy, S. Seifullin Kazakh AgroTechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Akhylbek KurishbayevFaculty of Agronomy, S. Seifullin Kazakh AgroTechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Yuri ShavrukovCollege of Science and Engineering, Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2941-0340
Flinders University · AUHuaiyin Normal University · CNS.Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University · KZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To feed the growing human population, global wheat yields should increase to approximately 5 tonnes per ha from the current 3.3 tonnes by 2050. To reach this goal, existing breeding practices must be complemented with new techniques built upon recent gains from wheat genome sequencing, and the accumulated knowledge of genetic determinants underlying the agricultural traits responsible for crop yield and quality. In this review we primarily focus on the tools and techniques available for accessing gene functions which lead to clear phenotypes in wheat. We provide a view of the development of wheat transformation techniques from a historical perspective, and summarize how techniques have been adapted to obtain gain-of-function phenotypes by gene overexpression, loss-of-function phenotypes by expressing antisense RNAs (RNA interference or RNAi), and most recently the manipulation of gene structure and expression using site-specific nucleases, such as CRISPR/Cas9, for genome editing. The review summarizes recent successes in the application of wheat genetic manipulation to increase yield, improve nutritional and health-promoting qualities in wheat, and enhance the crop's resistance to various biotic and abiotic stresses.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene Transfer TechniquesPlants, Genetically ModifiedTriticumCrops, AgriculturalGene Editing

Identifiers

PMID30956982
PMCPMC6431451
OpenAlexW2921676066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.