Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30956971›Full record

ReviewMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria)2019

Forty-five-year evolution of probiotic therapy.

Scarlett Puebla-Barragan, Gregor Reid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial cell (Graz, Austria), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Microbiome and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Overcoming Anxiety Disorder by ProbioticFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Propolis ethanolic extract has double-faceSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Scarlett Puebla-BarraganDepartments of Microbiology & Immunology, and Surgery, Western University.
Gregor ReidDepartments of Microbiology & Immunology, and Surgery, Western University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past forty-five years, the field of probiotics has grown from a handful of laboratory studies and clinical ideas into a legitimate research and translational entity conferring multiple benefits to humans around the world. This has been founded upon three principles: (i) the need for alterna-tives to drugs that either have sub-optimal efficacy or severe adverse effects; (ii) a growing interest in natural products and microbes, in particular cata-lyzed by studies showing the extent of microbes within humans and on our planet; and (iii) evidence on the genetics and metabolic properties of probi-otic strains, and clinical studies showing their effectiveness. While some man-ufacturers have sadly taken advantage of the market growth to sell supple-ments and foods they term probiotic, without the necessary human study evidence, there are more and more companies basing their formulations on science. Adherence to the definition of what constitutes a probiotic, conclu-sions based on tested products not generalizations of the whole field, and applications emanating from microbiome research identifying new strains that provide benefits, will make the next forty-five years significantly changed approaches to health management. Exciting applications will emerge for car-diovascular, urogenital, respiratory, brain, digestive and skin health, detoxifi-cation, as well as usage across the world's ecosystems.

Indexed as

cardiovasculargastrointestinalLactobacillusprobioticstherapyurogenital

Identifiers

PMID30956971
PMCPMC6444557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.