Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30956753›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging2018

TOWARDS OPTIMAL LINEAR ESTIMATION OF ORIENTATION DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS WITH ARBITRARILY SAMPLED DIFFUSION MRI DATA.

Divya Varadarajan, Justin P Haldar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. BrainSuite BIDS App: Containerized Workflows for MRI Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Diffusion MRI with Machine Learning.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Divya VaradarajanSignal and Image Processing Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Justin P HaldarSignal and Image Processing Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.

Funding

Interactive software for semiautomated analysis of structural brain imagesR01NS074980 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LEAHY, RICHARD M, SHATTUCK, DAVID W · 2011 to 2021
$5.0M
A Brain Atlas for Mapping Connectivity in Focal EpilepsyR01NS089212 · NINDS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI LEAHY, RICHARD M, MOSHER, JOHN COMPTON · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
Faster MRI with Sparse Sampling and Low-Rank ModelingR21EB022951 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HALDAR, JUSTIN PRITAM · 2016 to 2017
$430k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB022951NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074980NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS089212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The estimation of orientation distribution functions (ODFs) from diffusion MRI data is an important step in diffusion tractography, but existing estimation methods often depend on signal modeling assumptions that are violated by real data, lack theoretical characterization, and/or are only applicable to a small range of q-space sampling patterns. As a result, existing ODF estimation methods may be suboptimal. In this work, we propose a novel ODF estimation approach that learns a linear ODF estimator from training data. The training set contains ideal data samples paired with corresponding ideal ODFs, and the learning procedure reduces to a simple linear least-squares problem. This approach can accommodate arbitrary q-space sampling schemes, can be characterized theoretically, and is theoretically demonstrated to generalize far beyond the training set. The proposed approach is evaluated with simulated and

Identifiers

PMID30956753
PMCPMC6448790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.