ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction With Low-intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind, Cross-over Study
Treatment of Chronic Prostatitis/ Pelvic Pain Syndrome With Low-intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind, Cross-over Study
Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction - A Randomized Controlled Trial With Sham Therapy
A Single Arm Study of EXtracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for mAnagement of ereCtile dYsfunction (EXSTACY Study)
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction: rethinking study design, implementation, and analysis.British medical bulletin · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Insights into the peripheral nature of persistent sexual dysfunction associated with post-finasteride, post-SSRI and post-accutane syndromes: lessons learned from a case study.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Randomized trial of low intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction utilizing grayscale ultrasound for analysis of erectile tissue homogeneity/inhomogeneity.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- Sexual health in patients with malignant hematological disease: a Danish cross-sectional study.Sexual medicine · 2024Article
- Variations in Low Intensity Shockwave Treatment Protocols for Erectile Dysfunction: A Review of the Literature and Guide to Offering Treatment.The world journal of men's health · 2024Review
- News and future perspectives of non-surgical treatments for erectile dysfunction.International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- Low-intensity shockwave therapy improves baseline erectile function: a randomized sham-controlled crossover trial.Sexual medicine · 2023Article
- Radial wave therapy does not improve early recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a prospective trial.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment in Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Shock Wave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction: Marketing and Practice Trends in Major Metropolitan Areas in the United States.Urology practice · 2022Article
- Li-Eswt improves hemodynamic parameters thus suggesting neoangiogenesis in patients with vascular erectile dysfunction.International journal of impotence research · 2022Review
- Low-intensity shock wave therapy for the treatment of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction: a narrative review of technical considerations and treatment outcomes.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Review
- "Doc, if it were you, what would you do?": a survey of Men's Health specialists' personal preferences regarding treatment modalities.International journal of impotence research · 2021Article
- Early Clinical Results of the Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Administration in Erectile Dysfunction.Sexual medicine · 2021Article
- Alternative Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction: a Growing Arsenal in Men's Health.Current urology reports · 2021Review
- Novel Emerging Therapies for Erectile Dysfunction.The world journal of men's health · 2021Review
- Retrospective comparison of focused shockwave therapy and radial wave therapy for men with erectile dysfunction.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Article
- Phosphodiesterase Type-5 Inhibitor Prescription Patterns in the United States Among Men With Erectile Dysfunction: An Update.The journal of sexual medicine · 2020Article
- The good, bad, and the ugly of regenerative therapies for erectile dysfunction.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate the efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LiESWT) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive search of
resultsA total of seven RCTs provided data for 607 patients. The mean IIEF-EF 1 month post-treatment ranged from 12.8 to 22.0 in the treatment group
conclusionsThis is the first meta-analysis that evaluates RCTs exploring LiESWT as a treatment modality strictly for ED. This therapeutic strategy appears to be well tolerated with short-term benefits. However further studies exploring specific treatment regimens and long-term outcomes are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.