Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30956538›Full record

ArticleBiological invasions2018

Effects of admixture in native and invasive populations of

Jun Shi, Mirka Macel, Katja Tielbörger, Koen J F Verhoeven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological invasions, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular methods for differentiatingApplications in plant sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun Shi1Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Plant Ecology Group, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Mirka Macel1Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Plant Ecology Group, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Katja Tielbörger1Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Plant Ecology Group, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Koen J F Verhoeven4Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3002-4102

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraspecific hybridization between diverged populations can enhance fitness via various genetic mechanisms. The benefits of such admixture have been proposed to be particularly relevant in biological invasions, when invasive populations originating from different source populations are found sympatrically. However, it remains poorly understood if admixture is an important contributor to plant invasive success and how admixture effects compare between invasive and native ranges. Here, we used experimental crosses in

Indexed as

AdmixtureBiological invasionsHeterosisInbreeding depressionPhenotypic plasticityPurple loosestrife

Identifiers

PMID30956538
PMCPMC6417435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.