ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2019
An Analysis of Cause of Stillbirth in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Delhi: A Contribution to the WHO SEARO Project.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global and regional incidence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Stillbirth rates, trend and distribution in the Volta region, Ghana: findings from institutional data analysis, 2018-2022.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Impact of Action Taken in Response to Stillbirth Audit: A Success Story.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2023Article
- Predictive Model for Late Stillbirth Among Antenatal Hypertensive Women.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2022Article
- Article
- Quality Assessment of Stillbirth Review: A Pilot Study in Ten High-Priority Districts in Odisha.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver 98% of the world's total stillbirths are believed to occur in developing countries and still have received very little research, programmatic or policy attention. AIMS AND
objectiveTo collect data on epidemiological profile of cases experiencing stillbirths, to assess the associated antenatal high risk factors present and to find out the probable cause of stillbirth. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a cross-sectional, observational study, which was done as part of WHO SEARO project after ethical clearance. The study included all stillbirths which occurred in the hospital during the study period August 2015-February 2017. Antenatal records were reviewed; maternal investigations were done. Baby was examined after delivery. Pre-structured pro forma was filled for every case. Finally, the relevant condition found was classified under CODAC system of stillbirth classification.
resultOut of 20,580 deliveries, 600 (2.9%) were stillborn. Maternal cause was noted in 145/600 (24.2%) cases, fetal cause was noted in 181/600 (30.2%), and placental and cord origins were suspected in 128/600 (21.3%) and 12/600 (2%) cases, respectively. In 72/600 (12.0%) cases the reason for stillbirth was unknown and unclassifiable. Among the maternal causes the most common was hypertension (89/600, 14.8%) followed by infection including fever (5.7%); the most common infection was hepatitis. Among the fetal causes birth defect was the most common (106/600, 17.7%) followed by extreme prematurity in 42/600 (7.0%).
conclusionBirth defects were the most important fetal cause of stillbirth; hypertension in pregnancy and fetal growth restriction were important associated factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.