Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30956434›Full record

ArticlePhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology2019

Role of activated charcoal and amino acids in developing an efficient regeneration system for foxtail millet (

Periyasamy Rathinapriya, Lakkakula Satish, Ramakrishnan Rameshkumar, Subramani Pandian, Arockiam Sagina Rency, Manikandan Ramesh

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multi-omics intervention inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  2. The protective effects of polyamines on salinity stress tolerance in foxtail millet (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Periyasamy Rathinapriya1Department of Biotechnology, Science Campus, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu 630 003 India.
Lakkakula Satish2Department of Biotechnology Engineering, The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of Negev, 84105 Beer Sheva, Israel.
Ramakrishnan Rameshkumar1Department of Biotechnology, Science Campus, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu 630 003 India.
Subramani Pandian1Department of Biotechnology, Science Campus, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu 630 003 India.
Arockiam Sagina Rency1Department of Biotechnology, Science Campus, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu 630 003 India.
Manikandan Ramesh1Department of Biotechnology, Science Campus, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu 630 003 India.ORCID 0000-0002-1445-8122
Alagappa University · INBen-Gurion University of the Negev · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An efficacious, reproducible direct in vitro regeneration system has been developed from leaf base segments (LBs) of six high yielding genotypes of foxtail millet (

Indexed as

AdditivesDirect multiple shootsMolecular markersPlant growth regulatorsPlant regeneration

Identifiers

PMID30956434
PMCPMC6419705
OpenAlexW2901259232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.