Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30955137›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2020

BaByVFSSImP

Bonnie Martin-Harris, Kathryn A Carson, Jeanne M Pinto, Maureen A Lefton-Greif

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Predicting penetration-aspiration through quantitative swallow measures of children: a videofluoroscopic study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Observational
  14. Review
  15. Best Practices in Modified Barium Swallow Studies.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bonnie Martin-HarrisDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Communication, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA. bonnie.martinharris@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7840-3764
Kathryn A CarsonDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, 2024 East Monument Street, Suite 2-500, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Jeanne M PintoEudowood Division of Pediatric Respiratory Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, David M. Rubenstein Building, Suite 3070, 200 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Maureen A Lefton-GreifEudowood Division of Pediatric Respiratory Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, David M. Rubenstein Building, Suite 3017, 200 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.

Funding

Standardization of Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies for Bottle-Fed ChildrenR01DC011290 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LEFTON-GREIF, MAUREEN A, MARTIN-HARRIS, BONNIE J · 2011 to 2015
$1.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis investigation tested the construct validity of the first standardized assessment tool, the BaByVFSS Impairment Profile, (BaByVFSSImP©), developed for the quantification of swallowing observations made from videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) in bottle-fed babies.

methodConstruct validity of the measures was tested using descriptive methods and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of swallowing scores obtained from a cohort of bottle-fed babies (median age 3 months 1 day, interquartile range 1 month 4 days-7 months 4 days) sequentially referred for VFSS based on clinical signs, symptoms, or risk factors associated with dysphagia and/or aspiration. Main outcome measures were emergence of functional domains derived from swallowing component impairment scores.

resultsConfirmatory factor analysis resulted in 21 significant components (factor loadings ≥ 0.5) grouping into five functional domains labeled for common contribution to overall swallowing function. The tool was organized into the BaByVFSSImP. Clinical relevance was explored using correlational analyses between domain scores, maximum penetration/aspiration scores, feeding status, and caregiver burden.

interpretationQuantification of physiologic swallowing impairment captured by BaByVFSSImP holds promise for identification of physiologically based targets for intervention, clinical decisions regarding enteral feeding, and tracking the trajectory of swallowing impairment throughout development in young children.

Indexed as

Bottle FeedingCineradiographyDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersFactor Analysis, StatisticalFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInfantMaleReproducibility of ResultsRespiratory AspirationDeglutitionDeglutition disordersDysphagiaInfantMBSReliabilityVFSS

Identifiers

PMID30955137
PMCPMC6778717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.