Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30955055›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2019

Perineal ultrasound for the measurement of urethral mobility: a study of inter- and intra-observer reliability.

Anne-Cécile Pizzoferrato, Krystel Nyangoh Timoh, Georges Bader, Julie Fort, Xavier Fritel, Arnaud Fauconnier

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The role of transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence cases.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anne-Cécile PizzoferratoResearch Unit EA7285, Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health, Université Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France. acpizzofe@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3973-6018
Krystel Nyangoh TimohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Rennes Hospital, Université de Rennes 1:2 avenue de Professeur Léon Bernard, 35000, Rennes, France.
Georges BaderDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Intercommunal Hospital Center of Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France.
Julie FortDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Intercommunal Hospital Center of Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France.
Xavier FritelPoitiers University, INSERM CIC1402, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Arnaud FauconnierResearch Unit EA7285, Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health, Université Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy · FRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisUltrasound measurement of urethral mobility is an attractive approach to directly visualize bladder neck descent (BND) during stress. BND assessed by transperineal ultrasound appears to be associated with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) severity. This study evaluated the inter- and intra-observer reliability of ultrasound BND measurement and its correlation with clinical examination.

methodsWe included 50 women from the multicenter randomized 3PN study ("Prenatal Perineal Prevention"). BND was measured by two operators either during pregnancy (at 20 weeks of gestation) or 2 months after delivery. Two measurements were taken by each operator. Intra-class coefficient correlations were used for analysis. Urethral mobility was clinically assessed by measuring the point Aa of the POP-Q classification during maximum strain (Valsalva maneuver) with an empty bladder.

resultsUltrasound analysis showed high intra-observer reliability in the overall population: intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) = 0.75 (0.59-0.85) and 0.73 (0.55-0.84) for each operator. Intra-observer agreements were considered moderate to high in the post- and antepartum groups. Inter-observer agreements were moderate in the antepartum period [ICC = 0.58 (0.26-0.78) for the first measurement and 0.68 (0.42-0.84) for the second] but low in the postpartum period [ICC = 0.15 (0.10-0.41) and 0.21 (0.10-0.58)]. Correlations between ultrasound and clinical measurements were considered low to moderate (Spearman coefficient, rho = 0.34 and 0.50 for post- and antepartum periods, respectively).

conclusionsInter-observer reliability of ultrasound urethral mobility measurements by the transperineal route is moderate antepartum and low postpartum. The correlation with point Aa is low to moderate.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedObserver VariationPerineumPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographyUltrasonography, PrenatalUrethraUrinary Incontinence, StressValsalva ManeuverBladder neck distancePerineal sonographyReliabilityUrethral mobility

Identifiers

PMID30955055
OpenAlexW2925540734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.