ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2019
Perineal ultrasound for the measurement of urethral mobility: a study of inter- and intra-observer reliability.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of pelvic floor muscle training on pelvic floor muscle morphometry in subjects with pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of urethral parameters in females presenting cystoceles with and without stress urinary incontinence based on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: are they different?Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Trial
- Transperineal Ultrasound Measurement of Retrovesical Angle at Rest for Assessing Severity of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of Urethral Elasticity by Shear Wave Elastography: A Novel Parameter Bridging a Gap Between Hypermobility and ISD in Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence models derived from 2D transperineal ultrasound images in the clinical diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Can the inability to contract the pelvic floor muscles influence the severity of urinary incontinence symptoms in females?International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Intra- and inter-rater reliability of urethral mobility measurement by ultrasound in women: a cross-section study.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- The role of transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence cases.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisUltrasound measurement of urethral mobility is an attractive approach to directly visualize bladder neck descent (BND) during stress. BND assessed by transperineal ultrasound appears to be associated with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) severity. This study evaluated the inter- and intra-observer reliability of ultrasound BND measurement and its correlation with clinical examination.
methodsWe included 50 women from the multicenter randomized 3PN study ("Prenatal Perineal Prevention"). BND was measured by two operators either during pregnancy (at 20 weeks of gestation) or 2 months after delivery. Two measurements were taken by each operator. Intra-class coefficient correlations were used for analysis. Urethral mobility was clinically assessed by measuring the point Aa of the POP-Q classification during maximum strain (Valsalva maneuver) with an empty bladder.
resultsUltrasound analysis showed high intra-observer reliability in the overall population: intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) = 0.75 (0.59-0.85) and 0.73 (0.55-0.84) for each operator. Intra-observer agreements were considered moderate to high in the post- and antepartum groups. Inter-observer agreements were moderate in the antepartum period [ICC = 0.58 (0.26-0.78) for the first measurement and 0.68 (0.42-0.84) for the second] but low in the postpartum period [ICC = 0.15 (0.10-0.41) and 0.21 (0.10-0.58)]. Correlations between ultrasound and clinical measurements were considered low to moderate (Spearman coefficient, rho = 0.34 and 0.50 for post- and antepartum periods, respectively).
conclusionsInter-observer reliability of ultrasound urethral mobility measurements by the transperineal route is moderate antepartum and low postpartum. The correlation with point Aa is low to moderate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.