Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30954861›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2019

Cell type and circuit modules in the spinal cord.

Peter J Osseward, Samuel L Pfaff

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Motor Circuit Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter J OssewardGene Expression Laboratory and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Samuel L PfaffGene Expression Laboratory and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: pfaff@salk.edu.
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

Spinal Circuits for the Control of Dextrous MovementU19NS112959 · NINDS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI GOULDING, MARTYN D · 2019 to 2023
$14.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNINDS NIH HHS U19 NS112959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spinal cord contains an extraordinarily diverse population of interconnected neurons to process somatosensory information and execute movement. Studies of the embryonic spinal cord have elucidated basic principles underlying the specification of spinal cord neurons, while adult and postnatal studies have provided insight into cell type function and circuitry. However, the overarching principles that bridge molecularly defined subtypes with their connectivity, physiology, and function remain unclear. This review consolidates recent work in spinal neuron characterization, examining how molecular and spatial features of individual spinal neuron types relate to the reference points of connectivity and function. This review will focus on how spinal neuron subtypes are organized to control movement in the mouse.

Indexed as

NeuronsSpinal CordAnimalsMovement

Identifiers

PMID30954861
PMCPMC8559966
OpenAlexW2929509476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.