Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30954852›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2019

DeepPET: A deep encoder-decoder network for directly solving the PET image reconstruction inverse problem.

Ida Häggström, C Ross Schmidtlein, Gabriele Campanella, Thomas J Fuchs

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
29.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 308 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Theranostics.Journal of nuclear medicine technology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Optimizing Attenuation Correction inDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications in Magnetic Particle Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Review
  17. Monte Carlo methods for medical imaging research.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ida HäggströmDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States. Electronic address: haeggsti@mskcc.org.
C Ross SchmidtleinDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Gabriele CampanellaDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States; Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Thomas J FuchsDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States; Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to implement a deep learning network to overcome two of the major bottlenecks in improved image reconstruction for clinical positron emission tomography (PET). These are the lack of an automated means for the optimization of advanced image reconstruction algorithms, and the computational expense associated with these state-of-the art methods. We thus present a novel end-to-end PET image reconstruction technique, called DeepPET, based on a deep convolutional encoder-decoder network, which takes PET sinogram data as input and directly and quickly outputs high quality, quantitative PET images. Using simulated data derived from a whole-body digital phantom, we randomly sampled the configurable parameters to generate realistic images, which were each augmented to a total of more than 291,000 reference images. Realistic PET acquisitions of these images were simulated, resulting in noisy sinogram data, used for training, validation, and testing the DeepPET network. We demonstrated that DeepPET generates higher quality images compared to conventional techniques, in terms of relative root mean squared error (11%/53% lower than ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM)/filtered back-projection (FBP), structural similarity index (1%/11% higher than OSEM/FBP), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (1.1/3.8 dB higher than OSEM/FBP). In addition, we show that DeepPET reconstructs images 108 and 3 times faster than OSEM and FBP, respectively. Finally, DeepPET was successfully applied to real clinical data. This study shows that an end-to-end encoder-decoder network can produce high quality PET images at a fraction of the time compared to conventional methods.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPositron-Emission TomographyDeep LearningHumansImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID30954852
PMCPMC6537887
OpenAlexW2798538010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.