ReviewBone2019
Proteomic studies of bone and skeletal health outcomes.
Review in Bone, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Comparison of Bone Proteome Extraction Methods to Allow for Integrated Proteomics-Metabolomics Correlation.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Plasma proteomic profiles reveal proteins and three characteristic patterns associated with osteoporosis: A prospective cohort study.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- Direct In-Bone Protein Digestion With Subsequent LC Separation and Trap Ion Mobility MS Detection of Released Peptides as an Effective Tool for the Proteomic Characterization of Bone Tissues.Journal of separation science · 2025Article
- Current cutting-edge omics techniques on musculoskeletal tissues and diseases.Bone research · 2025Review
- Article
- [Tissue biomechanics: connective tissue characterization : Cluster tissue biomechanics].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Mass Spectrometry Reveals Molecular Effects of Citrulline Supplementation during Bone Fracture Healing in a Rat Model.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024Article
- Proteomic Insights into Osteoporosis: Unraveling Diagnostic Markers of and Therapeutic Targets for the Metabolic Bone Disease.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Article
- Inflammation produced by senescent osteocytes mediates age-related bone loss.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Using "-omics" Data to Inform Genome-wide Association Studies (GWASs) in the Osteoporosis Field.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021Review
- Bone Phenotyping Approaches in Human, Mice and Zebrafish - Expert Overview of the EU Cost Action GEMSTONE ("GEnomics of MusculoSkeletal traits TranslatiOnal NEtwork").Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Review
- Advances in Sensing Technologies for Monitoring of Bone Health.Biosensors · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Proteins are an essential part of essentially all biological processes, and there is enormous variation in protein forms and concentrations that is not reflected in DNA or RNA. Recently there have been rapid advances in the ability to measure protein sequence, modification and concentration, particularly with methods based in mass spectrometry. Global measures of proteins in tissues or in the circulation provide a broad assessment of the proteome that can be extremely useful for discovery, and targeted proteomic measures can yield specific and sensitive assessments of specific peptides and proteins. While most proteomic measures are directed at the detection of consensus peptide sequences, mass spectrometry based proteomic methods also allow a detailed examination of the peptide sequence differences that result from genetic variants and that may have important effects on protein function. In evaluating proteomic data, a number of analytical considerations are important, including an understanding of missing data, the challenge of multiple testing and replication, and the use of rapidly evolving methods in systems biology. While proteomics has not yet had a major impact in skeletal research, interesting recent research has used these approaches in the study of bone cell biology and the discovery of biomarkers of skeletal disorders. Proteomics can be expected to have an increasing influence in the study of bone biology and pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.