Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30954637›Full record

ArticlePharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2019

Exploring the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine and varenicline.

Brady M Thompson, Scott T Barrett, Rick A Bevins

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Considering Drug-Associated Contexts in Substance Use Disorders and Treatment Development.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brady M ThompsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Scott T BarrettDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Rick A BevinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA. Electronic address: rbevins1@unl.edu.
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

Pharmacological interventions to diminish nicotine associated respondingR01DA034389 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI BEVINS, RICK A · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning processes associated with nicotine influence the development of addiction to tobacco products. In the present report, we are interested in the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine acquiring control over appetitive behaviors - specifically, reward seeking. Also of interest is the current smoking cessation drug, varenicline (Chantix®). Varenicline, with its nicotine-like stimulus effects, can decrease withdrawal and cravings for a subset of individuals addicted to nicotine, though relapse is still common. We trained rats (N = 48) with nicotine (0.4 mg/kg, SC) as an excitatory stimulus (i.e., paired with sucrose) in a drug-discriminated goal-tracking (DGT) task. There was no access to sucrose on interspersed saline days. After acquisition of the initial nicotine-saline discrimination, rats were separated into four groups to test discrimination reversal and drug substitution. The control group maintained nicotine as the excitatory stimulus (NIC+). The substitution group had varenicline (1 mg/kg) replace nicotine as the stimulus paired with sucrose (VAR+). One reversal group had nicotine signal the absence of sucrose (i.e., now available on intermixed saline sessions; NIC-). The last group was similar to the NIC- group except varenicline replaced nicotine on non-reinforced sessions (VAR-). We found that varenicline fully substituted as the training stimulus when the drug-sucrose relation remained in place (VAR+). Both reversal groups acquired the new discrimination, albeit slowly and more variable for the VAR- group in comparison to NIC-. There was an effect of group during substitution testing. Specifically, nicotine fully substituted for varenicline regardless of condition. However, varenicline only partially substituted for the nicotine stimulus. At the start of extinction, responding mimicked that of the rats training condition. However, by extinction session 12, all groups maintained similarly low levels of responding. These findings show nicotine and varenicline share stimulus elements, yet the conclusion of partial to full substitution depends on the nature of the testing protocol.

Indexed as

AnimalsAppetitive BehaviorConditioning, ClassicalDiscrimination LearningDiscrimination, PsychologicalDrug SubstitutionExtinction, PsychologicalInjections, SubcutaneousInteroceptionMaleNicotineNicotinic AgonistsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySaline SolutionSmoking CessationNicotineNicotinic AgonistsSaline SolutionSucroseVareniclineChantix®Drug discriminationNicotinePavlovian conditioningReversal learningVarenicline

Identifiers

PMID30954637
PMCPMC6545145
OpenAlexW2934213613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.