Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30954624›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2019

Improving the adhesion, flexibility, and hemostatic efficacy of a sprayable polymer blend surgical sealant by incorporating silica particles.

John L Daristotle, Shadden T Zaki, Lung W Lau, Leopoldo Torres, Aristotelis Zografos, Priya Srinivasan, Omar B Ayyub, Anthony D Sandler, Peter Kofinas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bioadhesive microneedle patches for tissue sealing.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advances in Biomedical Applications of Solution Blow Spinning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Cohesion mechanisms for bioadhesives.Bioactive materials · 2022
    Review
  12. Biomaterials for Hemostasis.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Polymer nanomaterials for use as adjuvant surgical tools.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John L DaristotleFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, Room 3102 A. James Clark Hall, 8278 Paint Branch Dr., College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Shadden T ZakiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Maryland, 4418 Stadium Dr., College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Lung W LauSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Joseph E. Robert Jr. Center for Surgical Care, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Leopoldo TorresFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, Room 3102 A. James Clark Hall, 8278 Paint Branch Dr., College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Aristotelis ZografosDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Maryland, 4418 Stadium Dr., College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Priya SrinivasanSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Joseph E. Robert Jr. Center for Surgical Care, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Omar B AyyubDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, 4418 Stadium Dr., College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Anthony D SandlerSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Joseph E. Robert Jr. Center for Surgical Care, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Peter KofinasDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, 4418 Stadium Dr., College Park, MD 20742, USA. Electronic address: kofinas@umd.edu.
University of Maryland, College Park · USChildren's National · US

Funding

Direct Deposition of Polymer Fibers for Use as a Surgical SealantR01EB019963 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI KOFINAS, PETER, SANDLER, ANTHONY D. · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
Biodegradable Polymer Surgical Sealant with Increased Adhesion and Reduced InflammationF31EB025735 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI DARISTOTLE, JOHN LOUIS · 2018 to 2019
$42k
NIBIB NIH HHS F31 EB025735NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commercially available surgical sealants for internal use either lack sufficient adhesion or produce cytotoxicity. This work describes a surgical sealant based on a polymer blend of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) that increases wet tissue adherence by incorporation of nano-to-microscale silica particles, without significantly affecting cell viability, biodegradation rate, or local inflammation. In functional studies, PLGA/PEG/silica composite sealants produce intestinal burst pressures that are comparable to cyanoacrylate glue (160 mmHg), ∼2 times greater than the non-composite sealant (59 mmHg), and ∼3 times greater than fibrin glue (49 mmHg). The addition of silica to PLGA/PEG is compatible with a sprayable in situ deposition method called solution blow spinning and decreases coagulation time in vitro and in vivo. These improvements are biocompatible and cause minimal additional inflammation, demonstrating the potential of a simple composite design to increase adhesion to wet tissue through physical, noncovalent mechanisms and enable use in procedures requiring simultaneous occlusion and hemostasis. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Incorporating silica particles increases the tissue adhesion of a polymer blend surgical sealant. The particles enable interfacial physical bonding with tissue and enhance the flexibility of the bulk of the sealant, without significantly affecting cytotoxicity, inflammation, or biodegradation. These studies also demonstrate how silica particles decrease blood coagulation time. This surgical sealant improves upon conventional devices because it can be easily deposited with accuracy directly onto the surgical site as a solid polymer fiber mat. The deposition method, solution blow spinning, allows for high loading in the composite fibers, which are sprayed from a polymer blend solution containing suspended silica particles. These findings could easily be translated to other implantable or wearable devices due to the versatility of silica particles.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsMaterials TestingPolyestersPolyethylene GlycolsSilicon DioxideTissue AdhesivesAnimalsCell LineMiceSwineBiocompatible MaterialsPolyesterspolyethylene glycol-poly(lactide-co-glycolide)Polyethylene GlycolsSilicon DioxideTissue AdhesivesPolymer composite fibersSolution blow spinningSurgical sealantTissue adhesive

Identifiers

PMID30954624
PMCPMC6549514
OpenAlexW2934029056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.