ArticleJournal of pediatric surgery2019
Fetal echocardiography (ECHO) in assessment of structural heart defects in congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients: Is early postnatal ECHO necessary for ECMO candidacy?
Article in Journal of pediatric surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-natal prognostic factors in CDH: experience of 11 years in a referral center in Brazil.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2023Article
- Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: current management strategies from antenatal diagnosis to long-term follow-up.Pediatric surgery international · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of fetal echocardiogram (ECHO) for detecting cardiac structural anomalies that may impact Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) candidacy in infants with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH).
methodsA retrospective review was performed on fetuses with CDH (January 2007-June 2017). Inclusion criteria were inborn and at least one prenatal and postnatal ECHO. ECHOs were evaluated for structural heart defects. Primary outcomes were accuracy of prenatal fetal ECHO and identify differences between prenatal and postnatal ECHO. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square analysis were performed.
results131 inborn patients were identified. Mean gestational age of fetal ECHO was 26.6 ± 5.5 weeks. The median time to postnatal ECHO was DOL 1 [0-30]. Fetal ECHO had 92% accuracy, 83% sensitivity, 93% specificity, PPV of 95%, NPV of 92%, and a 90% accuracy for visualization of at least one pulmonary vein into the left atrium on the contralateral (non-CDH) side. Thirty-five percent of patients received ECMO, and 26% had an associated cardiac anomaly. All ECMO patients had an accurate structural fetal ECHO.
conclusionFetal ECHO is sufficient for identifying major structural heart defects at large volume centers with trained pediatric cardiologists and may be used to guide clinical management, particularly in regards to ECMO candidacy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.