ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2019
Enhanced tumor uptake and activity of nanoplex-loaded doxorubicin.
Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systemic dual delivery of a tumor-inhibiting plasmid expressing p16 and shRaf.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2025Article
- pH-Dependent Non-Covalent Release of Chemotherapy from Carriers.Discovery medicine · 2024Review
- Multitarget, multiagent PLGA nanoparticles for simultaneous tumor eradication and TME remodeling in a melanoma mouse model.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Article
- Synergistic Antitumor Potency of a Self-Assembling Cyclodextrin Nanoplex for the Co-Delivery of 5-Fluorouracil and Interleukin-2 in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- pH-Sensitive Targeting of Tumors with Chemotherapy-Laden Nanoparticles: Progress and Challenges.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Neuropilin 1 Regulation of Vascular Permeability Signaling.Biomolecules · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Doxorubicin (Dox) has widespread use as a cancer chemotherapeutic agent, but Dox is limited by several side effects including irreversible cardiomyopathy. Although liposomal Dox formulations, such as Doxil, mitigate side effects, they do not prolong survival in many patients. As a result, efforts have continued to discover improved formulations of Dox. We previously found that a peptide-based nanoplex delivered plasmid DNA efficiently to tumors in murine models. Unlike the majority of nanoparticles that depend solely on enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) for their transport into the tumor, our peptide-based nanoplex has a potential advantage in that its uptake primarily depends on neuropilin-1 receptor targeting. Because Dox binds to DNA, we tested whether this delivery platform could effectively deliver Dox to tumors and reduce their size. The nanoplexes increased the levels of Dox in tumors by about 5.5-fold compared to aqueous (free) Dox controls. Consistent with enhanced levels in the tumor, the nanoplex-Dox treatment had significantly greater anti-tumor activity. Whereas low dose free Dox did not reduce the size of tumors compared to untreated controls, the low dose nanoplex-Dox reduced the size of tumors by nearly 55% (p < 0.001). The high dose nanoplex-Dox also inhibited the size of tumor significantly more than the comparable high-dose free Dox (p < 0.001). Furthermore, apoptosis and proliferation markers (Ki67) of tumors observed in the different treatment groups correlated with their ability to inhibit tumor size. This study shows the efficacy of an NRP-1 targeted nanoplexes to deliver Dox to tumors in vivo and lays the groundwork for more complex and effective formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.