Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30954030›Full record

ArticleIranian biomedical journal2019

Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of Rhopalurus junceus Scorpion Venom in Tumor-Bearing Mice after Intravenous and Oral Administration

Alexis Díaz-García, Gilmara Pimentel González, Tais Basaco Bernabeu, Juan C. Rodríguez Aurrecochea, Hermis Rodríguez Sánchez, Iraida Sánchez Monzón, Maikel Hernández Gómez, Caridad Rodríguez Torres, Maria Regla Rodríguez Capote, Irania Guevara Orellanes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian biomedical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Voltage-Gated KFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexis Díaz-GarcíaResearch Department, Laboratories of Biopharmaceuticals and Chemistries Productions (LABIOFAM), Havana, Cuba.
Gilmara Pimentel GonzálezRadiopharmacy Laboratory, Oncology and Radiobiology National Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Tais Basaco BernabeuRadiopharmacy Laboratory, Oncology and Radiobiology National Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Juan C. Rodríguez AurrecocheaResearch Department, Laboratory of Experimental pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology National Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Hermis Rodríguez SánchezMicrobiology Department, Cell culture Laboratory, Tropical Medicine Institute “Pedro Kourí”, Havana, Cuba.
Iraida Sánchez MonzónRadiopharmacy Laboratory, Oncology and Radiobiology National Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Maikel Hernández GómezRadiopharmacy Laboratory, Oncology and Radiobiology National Institute, Havana, Cuba.
Caridad Rodríguez TorresResearch Department, Laboratories of Biopharmaceuticals and Chemistries Productions (LABIOFAM), Havana, Cuba.
Maria Regla Rodríguez CapoteResearch Department, Laboratories of Biopharmaceuticals and Chemistries Productions (LABIOFAM), Havana, Cuba.
Irania Guevara OrellanesResearch Department, Laboratories of Biopharmaceuticals and Chemistries Productions (LABIOFAM), Havana, Cuba.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rhopalurus junceus scorpion venom has shown potential for anticancer treatment. However, there are no scientific evidence about venom pharmacokinetic (PK) and biodistribution (BD) in tumor-bearing mice. Methods: 131I-labeled venom was administrated by intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) routes at the single dose of 12.5 mg/kg. Mice were sacrificed and blood samples, major organs, and tumor were taken at 10, 20, 40, 90, 180, 300, 480, and 1440 min. Results: For IV route, maximum peak concentration (Cmax), elimination half-lives, total body clearance (CL), distribution volume (Vd), mean residence time (MRT), and area under curve (AUC) were 21.77 ± 2.45 %Dosis•h/mL, 12.65 ± 2.1 h, 4.59 ± 0.23 mL/h, 83.80 ± 12 mL, 12.49 ± 2.71 h, and 21.77 ± 2.45 %Dosis•h/mL, respectively. For PO route, they were 0.60 ± 0.07 %Dosis•h/mL, 9.33 ± 1.35 h, 36.94 ± 4.01 mL/h, 497.33 ± 30 mL, 12.40 ± 1.87 h, and 6.89 ± 1.18 %Dosis•h/mL, respectively. PK parameters (Cmax, CL, Vd, and AUC) showed significant differences between IV and PO routes. Bioavailability was 31.6 ± 4% for PO dose. Kidney, stomach, liver, and lung for IV and stomach, kidney, spleen, and lung for PO routes showed the major uptakes for 131I-labeled venom. In tumor tissue, after the maximum uptake for both routes, there was a consistent behavior of radioactivity respect to the major organs during the first 480 min. Conclusion: The PK and BD of R. junceus venom in mice depend on the administration route. These data represent a starting point for future experiments with this scorpion venom in experimental models of cancer.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsCell Line, TumorInjections, IntravenousIodine RadioisotopesKineticsMaleMice, Inbred BALB CNeoplasmsRadioactivityScorpionsScorpion VenomsTissue DistributionIodine-131Iodine RadioisotopesScorpion VenomsIntravenousMiceOral administrationRadioactivityScorpion venom

Identifiers

PMID30954030
PMCPMC6462292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.