Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30953599›Full record

ReviewAllergy2019

Immunological methods for diagnosis and monitoring of IgE-mediated allergy caused by industrial sensitizing agents (IMExAllergy).

Xaver Baur, Cezmi A Akdis, Lygia Therese Budnik, Maria Jesus Cruz, Axel Fischer, Ulrike Förster-Ruhrmann, Thomas Göen, Ozlem Goksel, Astrid R Heutelbeck, Meinir Jones and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Allergy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Impact of Ambient Environmental and Occupational Pollution on Respiratory Diseases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  8. Work-related asthma.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2021
    Review
  9. Prevention of baker's asthma.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Xaver BaurEuropean Society for Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1880-1220
Cezmi A AkdisSwiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research, UZH, Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education, Davos, Switzerland.
Lygia Therese BudnikTranslational Toxicology and Immunology Unit, Institute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Maria Jesus CruzPneumology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9759-5466
Axel FischerClinical Research Unit of Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrike Förster-RuhrmannENT Clinic, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas GöenInstitute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8226-9227
Ozlem GokselPulmonary, Immunology and Allergy, Laboratory of Occupational & Environmental Respiratory Diseases and Asthma, EGE University, Izmir, Turkey.
Astrid R HeutelbeckInstitute for Occupational, Environmental and Social Medicine, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Meinir JonesImperial College London, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK.
Harald LuxInstitute for Occupational, Environmental and Social Medicine, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Piero MaestrelliDepartment of Cardiologic, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Xavier MunozPneumology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8693-022X
Benoit NemeryDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Centre for Environment and Health, Leuven, Belgium.
Vivi SchlünssenNational Research Center for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Torben SigsgaardDepartment of Public Health, Environment, Occupation & Health, & Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Claudia Traidl-HoffmannSwiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research, UZH, Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education, Davos, Switzerland.
Paul SiegelDivision Morgantown, Health Effects Laboratory, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Aarhus University · DKCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESEge University · TRFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEImperial College London · GBKU Leuven · BENational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Industrial sensitizing agents (allergens) in living and working environments play an important role in eliciting type 1 allergic disorders including asthma and allergic rhinitis. Successful management of allergic diseases necessitates identifying their specific causes (ie, identify the causative agent(s) and the route of contact to allergen: airborne, or skin contact) to avoid further exposure. Identification of sensitization by a sensitive and validated measurement of specific IgE is an important step in the diagnosis. However, only a limited number of environmental and occupational allergens are available on the market for use in sIgE testing. Accordingly, specific in-house testing by individual diagnostic and laboratory centers is often required. Currently, different immunological tests are in use at various diagnostic centers that often produce considerably divergent results, mostly due to lack of standardized allergen preparation and standardized procedures as well as inadequate quality control. Our review and meta-analysis exhibited satisfactory performance of sIgE detection test for most high molecular weight (HMW) allergens with a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 and specificity of 0.71. However, for low molecular weight (LMW) allergens, pooled sensitivity is generally lower (0.28) and specificity higher (0.89) than for HMW tests. Major recommendations based on the presented data include diagnostic use of sIgE to HMW allergens. A negative sIgE result for LMW agents does not exclude sensitization. In addition, the requirements for full transparency of the content of allergen preparations with details on standardization and quality control are underlined. Development of standard operating procedures for in-house sIgE assays, and clinical validation, centralized quality control and audits are emphasized. There is also a need for specialized laboratories to provide a custom service for the development of tests for the measurement of putative novel occupational allergens that are not commercially available.

Indexed as

ImmunoassayIndustryAir Pollutants, OccupationalAllergensAsthmaEnvironmental ExposureHumansHypersensitivity, ImmediateImmunoglobulin EMeta-Analysis as TopicOccupational ExposureReproducibility of ResultsAir Pollutants, OccupationalAllergensImmunoglobulin EasthmaIgEoccupational allergiesrhinitisurticaria

Identifiers

PMID30953599
PMCPMC6851709
OpenAlexW2935183285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.