ArticleTrials2019
The Vitamin C, Thiamine and Steroids in Sepsis (VICTAS) Protocol: a prospective, multi-center, double-blind, adaptive sample size, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.
Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-center, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Adaptive Clinical Trial of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Steroids as Combination Therapy in Patients With Sepsis.
Vitamin C, Hydrocortisone and Thiamine in Patients With Septic Shock: a Randomized Clinical Study (VITAMIN TRIAL)
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of different vitamins on individuals with septic shock: a Bayesian NMA of RCTs.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Therapeutic Role of HAT Therapy in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Pooled it
- Mortality in septic patients treated with vitamin C: a systematic meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Could Vitamins Help in the Fight Against COVID-19?Nutrients · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Design, simulate, refine: simulation-guided clinical trials for accelerated drug development.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Article
- Beyond Fluid Therapy: The Role of Vitamin C, Steroids, and Thiamine in Sepsis Management.Cureus · 2025Review
- Reevaluating vitamin C in sepsis and septic shock: a potential benefit in severe cases?Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Recent innovations in adaptive trial designs: A review of design opportunities in translational research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- Vitamin C and its therapeutic potential in the management of COVID19.Clinical nutrition ESPEN · 2022Review
- Article
- Beneficial Immune Regulation by Biological Response Modifier Glucans in COVID-19 and Their Envisaged Potentials in the Management of Sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Analysis of Dietary Supplement Use and Influencing Factors in the Mongolian Population.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Micronutrient therapy and effective immune response: a promising approach for management of COVID-19.Infection · 2021Review
- Management of sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.Internal and emergency medicine · 2021Review
- The relationship between vitamin C or thiamine levels and outcomes for severe sepsis patients admitted to the ICU.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Dietary Supplements for COVID-19.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Role of vitamin C in critically ill patients with COVID-19: is it effective?Acute and critical care · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis accounts for 30% to 50% of all in-hospital deaths in the United States. Other than antibiotics and source control, management strategies are largely supportive with fluid resuscitation and respiratory, renal, and circulatory support. Intravenous vitamin C in conjunction with thiamine and hydrocortisone has recently been suggested to improve outcomes in patients with sepsis in a single-center before-and-after study. However, before this therapeutic strategy is adopted, a rigorous assessment of its efficacy is needed.
methodsThe Vitamin C, Thiamine and Steroids in Sepsis (VICTAS) trial is a prospective, multi-center, double-blind, adaptive sample size, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. It will enroll patients with sepsis causing respiratory or circulatory compromise or both. Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous vitamin C (1.5 g), thiamine (100 mg), and hydrocortisone (50 mg) every 6 h or matching placebos until a total of 16 administrations have been completed or intensive care unit discharge occurs (whichever is first). Patients randomly assigned to the comparator group are permitted to receive open-label stress-dose steroids at the discretion of the treating clinical team. The primary outcome is consecutive days free of ventilator and vasopressor support (VVFDs) in the 30 days following randomization. The key secondary outcome is mortality at 30 days. Sample size will be determined adaptively by using interim analyses with pre-stated stopping rules to allow the early recognition of a large mortality benefit if one exists and to refocus on the more sensitive outcome of VVFDs if an early large mortality benefit is not observed. DISCUSSION: VICTAS is a large, multi-center, double-blind, adaptive sample size, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that will test the efficacy of vitamin C, thiamine, and hydrocortisone as a combined therapy in patients with respiratory or circulatory dysfunction (or both) resulting from sepsis. Because the components of this therapy are inexpensive and readily available and have very favorable risk profiles, demonstrated efficacy would have immediate implications for the management of sepsis worldwide.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03509350 . First registered on April 26, 2018, and last verified on December 20, 2018. Protocol version: 1.4, January 9, 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.