ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2019
Nutritional and metabolic derangements in Mediterranean cancer patients and survivors: the ECPC 2016 survey.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Prognostic Performance of Nutritional Indices in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Addressing the Neglected Burden of Cancer Cachexia: A Quasi-Experimental Study at Uganda Cancer Institute.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Nutritional information needs and search behaviors in argentine oncology patientsRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigating oral somatosensory perception and oral symptoms of head and neck cancer patients: insights on eating behaviour.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- VARIATIONS IN DIETARY HABITS DURING CANCER TREATMENT: RESULTS OF A CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY.Acta clinica Croatica · 2024Article
- The barriers to interprofessional care for cancer cachexia among Japanese healthcare providers: A nationwide survey.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2024Article
- Nutritional care for cancer patients: are we doing enough?Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- What do patients and oncologists think about the evaluation and management of cancer-related anorexia-cachexia? The Quasar_SEOM study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023Article
- Nutrition care is an integral part of patient-centred medical care: a European consensus.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Article
- Innovative strategies to predict and prevent the risk for malnutrition in child, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Review
- The Determination of a Consensus Nutritional Approach for Cancer Patients in Spain Using the Delphi Methodology.Nutrients · 2022Article
- A Novel Systemic Inflammation Prognostic Score to Stratify Survival in Elderly Patients With Cancer.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- Quality of life, symptoms and dietary habits in oncology outpatients with malnutrition: A cross-sectional study.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2021Article
- Nutrition in the spotlight in cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle: avoiding the wildfire.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2021Article
- Awareness of Cancer-Related Malnutrition and Its Management: Analysis of the Results From a Survey Conducted Among Medical Oncologists.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Association Between Systemic Inflammation and Malnutrition With Survival in Patients With Cancer Sarcopenia-A Prospective Multicenter Study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
- Nutritional and metabolic derangements in Mediterranean cancer patients and survivors: the ECPC 2016 survey.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2019Article
- Barriers in Nursing Practice in Cancer Cachexia: A Scoping Review.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of nutritional derangements in patients with cancer is high. This survey assessed patients' awareness of cancer-related nutritional issues and evaluated how important they perceive the impact of nutrition on cancer and treatment to be.
methodsA structured questionnaire was developed to determine: presence of feeding problems, perception of nutrition importance, and perception of physicians' approach to nutrition. The European Cancer Patient Coalition disseminated the questionnaire to its members in 10 countries. The Mediterranean cluster (Italy, Spain, and Greece) was analysed separately to further determine specific patterns in answers.
resultsIn total, 907 respondents completed the questionnaire (68.8% female participants; 51.7% with cancer; 48.3% cancer survivors; 59.3% diagnosed with cancer ≤3 years ago; 46.2% receiving treatment for <1 year). Feeding problems during illness/therapy were experienced by 72.5% (628/867) of all respondents (Italian: 90.0%, 117/130), although up to 53.9% (467/867) reported that physicians did not check their feeding status. Overall, 69.6% (586/842) of respondents reported weight loss after cancer diagnosis (moderate to severe: 36.7%, 309/842). For Italian respondents, the percentages of overall weight loss and moderate-to-severe weight loss were 85.1% (109/128) and 70.3% (90/128), respectively. Only 35.0% (295/842) of all respondents reported having their weight measured regularly during treatment; 45.7% (385/842) believed their physician considered cancer-related weight loss unimportant. Respondents [all: 56.9% (472/830); Italian: 73.0% (92/126); Spanish: 68.9% (42/61); Greek: 79.7% (47/59)] were unaware of supplements' negative effects during therapy or the need to inform their physician about these supplements [all: 43.6% (362/830); Italian: 55.6% (70/126); Spanish: 47.5% (29/61); Greek: 49.2% (29/59)]. The term 'cachexia' was generally unknown to respondents [all: 72.9% (603/827); Italian: 64.3% (81/126); Spanish: 68.9% (42/61); Greek: 47.5% (28/59)] and most respondents [all: 92.4% (764/827); Italian: 91.3% (115/126); Spanish: 91.8% (56/61); Greek: 86.4% (51/59)] received no cachexia-related information.
conclusionsPatients reported differences in perspective between them and physicians on cancer-related nutritional issues and the specific nutritional approaches available for cancer treatment. Increasing physician focus on nutrition during treatment, particularly among Italian physicians, and providing information on optimizing nutrition to patients are essential factors to improving patients' quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.