Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30953269›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2020

Safety and clinical activity of the Notch inhibitor, crenigacestat (LY3039478), in an open-label phase I trial expansion cohort of advanced or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma.

C Even, U Lassen, J Merchan, C Le Tourneau, J-C Soria, C Ferte, F Ricci, J T Diener, E Yuen, C Smith and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

C EvenDrug Development Department (DITEP), Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif Cedex, France.
U LassenThe Finsen Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J MerchanUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
C Le TourneauDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France.
J-C SoriaDrug Development Department (DITEP), Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif Cedex, France.
C FerteDrug Development Department (DITEP), Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif Cedex, France.
F RicciDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France.
J T DienerEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
E YuenEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
C SmithEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
G J OakleyEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
K A BenhadjiEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Christophe MassardDrug Development Department (DITEP), Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif Cedex, France. christophe.massard@gustaveroussy.fr.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRInstitut Curie · FRRigshospitalet · DKUniversité Paris-Sud · FRUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Deregulated Notch signaling is implicated in multiple cancers. The phase I trial (I6F-MC-JJCA) investigated the safety and anti-tumor activity of crenigacestat (LY3039478), a selective oral Notch inhibitor, in an expansion cohort of patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) who received the dose-escalation-recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), established previously (Massard C, et al., Annals Oncol 2018, 29:1911-17). Methods Patients with advanced or metastatic cancer, measurable disease, ECOG-PS ≤1, and baseline tumor tissue were enrolled. Primary objectives were to identify a safe RP2D, confirm this dose in expansion cohorts, and document anti-tumor activity. Secondary objectives included safety and progression-free survival (PFS). The ACC expansion cohort received the RP2D regimen of 50 mg crenigacestat thrice per week in a 28-day cycle until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Results Twenty-two patients with ACC were enrolled in the expansion cohort (median age of 60 years). Median treatment duration was 3 cycles with 6 patients remaining on treatment. There were no objective responses; 1 (5%) patient had an unconfirmed partial response. Disease control rate was 73% and 4 patients had stable disease ≥6 months. Median PFS was 5.3 months (95%CI: 2.4-NE)) for the 22 patients; and 7.7 months (95%CI: 4.0-NR) and 2.4 months (95%CI: 1.1-NE) in the subgroup of patients in second-line (n = 7) or ≥ third-line (n = 9), respectively. Frequent treatment-related-adverse events (all grades) included diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, decreased appetite, dry mouth, and dry skin. There were no new safety signals. Conclusion The crenigacestat RP2D regimen induced manageable toxicity and limited clinical activity, without confirmed responses, in heavily pretreated patients with ACC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBenzazepinesCarcinoma, Adenoid CysticFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalReceptor, Notch1Tumor BurdenAntineoplastic AgentsBenzazepinescrenigacestatNOTCH1 protein, humanReceptor, Notch1Adenoid cystic carcinomaCrenigacestatLY3039478Notch pathwayPhase 1

Identifiers

PMID30953269
PMCPMC7066312
OpenAlexW2930171221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.