Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30953259›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2019

Do renal cell carcinoma patients with brain metastases still need nephrectomy?

Wei Zhuang, Yining Li, Panyu Chen, Jialiang Wang, Weihui Liu, Jiabi Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei ZhuangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Licheng District Zhongshan North Road, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Yining LiDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Licheng District Zhongshan North Road, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Panyu ChenDepartment of Clinical Medicine Science, The Second Clinical Medical School of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Jialiang WangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Licheng District Zhongshan North Road, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Weihui LiuDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Licheng District Zhongshan North Road, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Jiabi ChenDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Licheng District Zhongshan North Road, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China. chenjiabi0626@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3383-5667
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the value of nephrectomy for survival prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with brain metastases (BM).

methodsThere were 933 RCC patients diagnosed with BM in SEER database from 2010 to 2014. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were used to analyze the survival prognosis. The effect of nephrectomy on overall survival (OS) was analyzed by propensity score matching. The competitive risk model was performed to explore the relationship between surgery and cancer-specific survival (CSS), and the nomogram visualization model was established by R language to predict survival rate.

resultsBM accounted for 1.5% of newly diagnosed RCC patients and 11.1% of M1 stage patients with the median survival time of 5 months (95% CI 4.5-5.5). Age 45-65 years, tumor diameter > 10 cm and histologic type of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) were high risk factors for BM in RCC patients. Age, N stage, lung metastasis and nephrectomy were independent prognostic factors. Nephrectomy was beneficial for both OS and CSS for the analysis of 216 patients successfully matched. The nomogram model has a certain value in predicting the survival rate with the internal verification c-index of 0.727.

conclusionsPatients with high risk of BM (age 45-65 years, tumor diameter > 10 cm, histologic type of ccRCC) should emphasize brain imaging screening during follow-up. Nephrectomy may bring survival advantages for RCC patients with BM. Nomogram model based on nephrectomy can helps predicting the 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates.

Indexed as

NephrectomyAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateBrain metastasesEpidemiologyNephrectomyRenal cell carcinomaSurvival

Identifiers

PMID30953259
OpenAlexW2929401121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.