Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30953254›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2019

Comparison of Cardiovascular Benefits of Bariatric Surgery and Abdominal Lipectomy.

Petra Rocic

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Petra RocicDepartment of Pharmacology, New York Medical College, BSB 502, 15 Dana Road, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA. petra_rocic@nymc.edu.
New York Medical College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to examine recent evidence supporting effectiveness of bariatric surgery and abdominal lipectomy as interventional strategies aimed at reduction in incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and related morbidity and mortality in obese and metabolic syndrome patients. RECENT

findingsWhile several studies show reduction in CVD risk factors in patients who have undergone both the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, very few demonstrate actual improvements in cardiovascular function, or a decrease in CVD events or CVD-related mortality. Consequently, the cardiovascular benefits of the less invasive sleeve gastrectomy in comparison to the gastric bypass are also unclear. Striking new data on large patient samples demonstrate significant positive correlation between gastric bypass and CVD risk factor reduction only in patients who are diabetic or > 50 years of age at the time of surgery, with no significant differences in non-diabetic and younger patients and with significant side effects. On the other hand, a markedly less invasive removal of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue via lipectomy consistently and significantly improved CVD risk factors as well as cardiovascular function in the very few studies available. Overall, neither the potential nor the definitive cardiovascular benefits of either of the commonly used bariatric surgical or the various lipectomy procedures have been adequately explored. Future basic science and clinical studies have the opportunity to understand the mechanisms and long-term consequences of both approaches and develop personalized approaches with higher benefit to side effect ratios.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryLipectomyAbdominal FatCardiovascular DiseasesHumansMetabolic SyndromeObesityRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeWeight LossAbdominal lipectomyCardiovascular disease (CVD)Gastric bypassSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID30953254
OpenAlexW2929146787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.