Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30953252›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019

CT-derived left ventricular global strain: a head-to-head comparison with speckle tracking echocardiography.

F Ammon, D Bittner, M Hell, H Mansour, S Achenbach, M Arnold, M Marwan

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Advanced myocardial characterization and function with cardiac CT.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026
    Review
  3. Clinical application of cardiac computed tomography in cardiomyopathy.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

F AmmonDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany. fabian.ammon@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4931-1531
D BittnerDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
M HellDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
H MansourDepartment of Cardiology, Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
S AchenbachDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
M ArnoldDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
M MarwanDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed CT-derived left ventricular strain in a cohort of patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and validated it against 2 dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography as the gold standard. 65 consecutive patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis referred for CT imaging prior to TAVI were included in this analysis. For all patients, retrospectively ECG-gated multi-phase functional CT data sets acquired with identical reconstruction parameters were available. All data sets were acquired using a third generation dual source system. In all patients, multiphase reconstructions in increments of 10% of the cardiac cycle were rendered (slice thickness 0.75, increment 0.5 mm, medium smooth reconstruction kernel) and transferred to a dedicated workstation (Ziostation2, Ziosoft Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Additional functional reconstructions for dynamic assessment and quantification of strain were processed. Multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) of the left ventricle similar to standard echocardiographic 4, 2 and apical 3 chamber views were rendered in CT. Similar to echocardiographic longitudinal strain, the perimeter of the left ventricle was manually traced within the myocardium and peak maximal shortening as a parameter representing longitudinal strain was calculated for each view and averaged to obtain a marker for global longitudinal strain (CT perimeter-derived strain). Furthermore, for quantification of 3-dimensional strain, endocardial and epicardial borders of myocardium were marked in six short axis views and peak maximum 3- dimensional strain of the myocardium was calculated in standard six basal, six mid and four apical segments. 3-dimensional strain values of the 16 standard segments as well as perimeter-derived strain values in the three standard windows were averaged to obtain global strain. Echocardiography was performed in all patients before CT data acquisition. Digital loops were acquired from three apical views (four-, two-, and three chamber views). For assessment of 2 dimensional global longitudinal strain (GLS), recordings were processed with acoustic-tracking software allowing offline semiautomated speckle-based strain analyses. The mean age of all 65 patients was 81 ± 5 years. The mean echocardiographic ejection fraction and mean echocardiographic GLS were 50 ± 12% and -13.6 ± 4.5%, respectively. The mean CT-derived peak 3-dimensional global strain and mean peak strain derived by perimeter was 43.2 ± 13.5% and -11.2 ± 3.5%, respectively. Both CTderived global 3D-strain and perimeter derived strain showed a significant correlation to GLS derived by echocardiography (r = -0.8, p < 0.0001 for 3D strain and r = 0.71, p < 0.0001 for perimeter-derived strain). Bland-Altman analysis showed a systematic underestimation (i. e. worse strain values) of CT perimeter-derived strain compared to GLS by echocardiography (mean difference -2.4% with 95% limits of agreement between 4% to -9%). ROC Curve analysis assuming a normal GLS when less than -18% showed that a CT-derived peak 3-dimensional global strain cut-off-value of 45% has a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 60% for detecting normal left ventricular strain (AUC 0.81, p = 0.001). For CT perimeter-derived strain, a cut-off value of -12%-assuming a normal echocardiographic GLS when less than -18%-achieved a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 61% (AUC of 0.82, p = 0.001) for detecting abnormal left ventricular strain. Using dedicated software, assessment of CT-derived left ventricular strain is feasible and comparable to strain derived by echocardiographic 2 dimensional speckle tracking.

Indexed as

Myocardial ContractionStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisBiomechanical PhenomenaCardiac-Gated Imaging TechniquesEchocardiographyElectrocardiographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart VentriclesHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsCardiac CT angiographyEchocardiographyLeft ventricular global strainSpeckle tracking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.