Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30953144›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2019

Model validity for preclinical studies in precision medicine: precisely how precise do we need to be?

Abigail L D Tadenev, Robert W Burgess

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genetic Deletion of Sarm1 in Mouse Models of Three Neurological Diseases.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2025
    Article
  9. SARM1 Inhibition in Three Mouse Models of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2025
    Article
  10. Lurcher Mouse as a Model of Cerebellar Syndromes.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Preclinical Interventions in Mouse Models of Frontotemporal Dementia Due to Progranulin Mutations.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abigail L D TadenevThe Center for Precision Genetics, The Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609, USA.
Robert W BurgessThe Center for Precision Genetics, The Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609, USA. Robert.burgess@jax.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9229-3407
Jackson Laboratory · US

Funding

The Jackson Laboratory Center for Precision Genetics: From New Models to Novel TherapeuticsU54OD020351 · OD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BURGESS, ROBERT W. · 2015 to 2019
$10.2M
A Resource for Mouse Models of Peripheral NeuropathyR24NS098523 · NINDS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BOGDANIK, LAURENT P, BURGESS, ROBERT W. · 2016 to 2019
$1.2M
NIH HHS U54 OD020351NINDS NIH HHS R24 NS098523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promise of personalized medicine is that each patient's treatment can be optimally tailored to their disease. In turn, their disease, as well as their response to the treatment, is determined by their genetic makeup and the "environment," which relates to their general health, medical history, personal habits, and surroundings. Developing such optimized treatment strategies is an admirable goal and success stories include examples such as switching chemotherapy agents based on a patient's tumor genotype. However, it remains a challenge to apply precision medicine to diseases for which there is no known effective treatment. Such diseases require additional research, often using experimentally tractable models. Presumably, models that recapitulate as much of the human pathophysiology as possible will be the most predictive. Here we will discuss the considerations behind such "precision models." What sort of precision is required and under what circumstances? How can the predictive validity of such models be improved? Ultimately, there is no perfect model, but our continually improving ability to genetically engineer a variety of systems allows the generation of more and more precise models. Furthermore, our steadily increasing awareness of risk alleles, genetic background effects, multifactorial disease processes, and gene by environment interactions also allows increasingly sophisticated models that better reproduce patients' conditions. In those cases where the research has progressed sufficiently far, results from these models appear to often be translating to effective treatments for patients.

Indexed as

Patient-Specific ModelingPrecision MedicineAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGenetic BackgroundGenetic TherapyHumansPhenotypeReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID30953144
PMCPMC6606658
OpenAlexW2929140615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.