Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30953124›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2019

Splicing, genome stability and disease: splice like your genome depends on it!

Annie S Tam, Peter C Stirling

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annie S TamTerry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Peter C StirlingTerry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada. pstirling@bccrc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2651-4539
BC Cancer Agency · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-136982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spliceosome has been implicated in genome maintenance for decades. Recently, a surge in discoveries in cancer has suggested that the oncogenic mechanism of spliceosomal defects may involve defective genome stability. The action of the core spliceosome prevents R-loop accumulation, and regulates the expression of genome stability factors. At the same time, specific spliceosomal components have non-canonical functions in genome maintenance. Here we review these different models, highlighting their discovery in different model systems, and describing their potential impact on human disease states.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingDNA DamageGenetic Diseases, InbornGenome, HumanGenomic InstabilityHumansMutationRNA SplicingSpliceosomesCancerDNA damageLeukemiaR-loopsSplicing

Identifiers

PMID30953124
OpenAlexW2933180810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.