Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30953083›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2020

[Conservative treatment of periprosthetic humeral fractures years after cemented fracture prostheses : A case series].

H Siekmann, T S Bowen, M Huschak, F Radetzki, C Bauer, J Walther

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. [Periprosthetic fractures of the shoulder girdle].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
  3. [Periprosthetic fractures: basics, classification and treatment principles].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

H SiekmannDepartment für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Martin-Luther Universität, Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
T S BowenSchool of Biomedical Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, Großbritannien.
M HuschakDepartment für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Martin-Luther Universität, Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
F RadetzkiDepartment für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Martin-Luther Universität, Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland. florian.radetzki@klinikum-dessau.de.
C BauerDepartment für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Martin-Luther Universität, Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
J WaltherDepartment für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Martin-Luther Universität, Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe exact incidence of postoperative periprosthetic humeral fractures (PPHF) months or years after fracture-related implantation of a hemiprosthesis is unknown. The currently available literature is predominantly concerned with operative treatment approaches. As a rule, these involved older patients and severe fracture conditions so that severe complications and unsatisfactory healing results were described. This article presents an alternative conservative treatment approach which is discussed based on the results of treatment. PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween 2011 and 2016 a conservative treatment of 5 female patients with PPHF could be carried out. Of the patients 4 were clinically and radiologically controlled at a mean follow-up time of 23 months. The fifth patient died 2 months after the trauma and only partial information of the treatment was available.

resultThere were no intrahospital complications and just one posthospital complication. In the case of the patient who later died, repeated and unauthorized removal of the upper arm brace occurred in the nursing institution resulting in a lesion of the radial nerve. Of the four patients who completed treatment, three were very satisfied with the outcome of treatment. The mean DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and Oxford shoulder scores were on average 74 and 25 points, respectively. At the time of the follow-up examination all patients were free of pain, without the use of analgesics; however, there were still some limitations in the activities of daily life, which in three of the four patients was similar to the results following implantation of the fracture prosthesis.

conclusionThe conservative treatment of PPHF can be a safe treatment option in multimorbid and chronically ill patients. A close outpatient control and good patient compliance are important. In incompliant and dementia patients, the risk of failure of conservative treatment is increased.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentHumeral FracturesJoint ProsthesisPeriprosthetic FracturesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHumerusTreatment OutcomeClassificationConservative treatmentGeriatric traumaPeriprosthetic fractureShoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID30953083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.