Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30953080›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2019

[Update cartilage imaging of the small joints : Focus on high-field MRI].

R Heiss, R Janka, M Uder, A M Nagel, S Trattnig, F W Roemer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

R HeissInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland. rafael.heiss@uk-erlangen.de.
R JankaInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
M UderInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
A M NagelInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
S TrattnigHigh Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Österreich.
F W RoemerInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEImaging Center · USMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCartilage imaging of small joints is increasingly of interest, as early detection of cartilage damage may be relevant regarding individualized surgical therapies and long-term outcomes. PURPOSE: The aim of this review is to explain modern cartilage imaging of small joints with emphasis on MRI and to discuss the role of methods such as CT arthrography as well as compositional and high-field MRI. MATERIALS AND

methodsA PubMed literature search was performed for the years 2008-2018.

resultsClinically relevant cartilage imaging to detect chondral damage in small joints remains challenging. Conventional MRI at 3 T can still be considered as a reference for cartilage imaging in clinical routine. In terms of sensitivity, MR arthrography (MR-A) and computed tomography arthrography (CT-A) are superior to non-arthrographic MRI at 1.5 T in the detection of chondral damage. Advanced degenerative changes of the fingers and toes are usually sufficiently characterized by conventional radiography. MRI at field strengths of 3 T and ultrahigh-field imaging at 7 T can provide additional quantifiable, functional and metabolic information.

conclusionStandardized cartilage imaging plays an important role in clinical diagnostics in the ankle joint due to the availability of different and individualized therapeutic concepts. In contrast, cartilage imaging of other small joints as commonly performed in clinical studies has not yet become standard of care in daily clinical routine. Although individual study results are promising, additional studies with large patient collectives are needed to validate these techniques. With rapid development of new treatment concepts radiological diagnostics will play a more significant role in the diagnosis of cartilage lesions of small joints.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesArthrographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnkleGlycosaminoglycansLiterature reviewMagnetic resonance imagingWrist

Identifiers

PMID30953080
OpenAlexW2929183997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.