Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30952978›Full record

ArticleNature biomedical engineering2019

Exploration of the nanomedicine-design space with high-throughput screening and machine learning.

Gokay Yamankurt, Eric J Berns, Albert Xue, Andrew Lee, Neda Bagheri, Milan Mrksich, Chad A Mirkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. E7Science advances · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Structural immunotherapy: Harnessing chemical design to build powerful next-generation therapeutics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gokay YamankurtInterdisciplinary Biological Sciences Graduate Program, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2017-9848
Eric J BernsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2203-0847
Albert XueDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8561-9416
Andrew LeeDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. andrew.lee3@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7665-1999
Neda BagheriDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. n-bagheri@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0146-4627
Milan MrksichDepartment of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. milan.mrksich@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4964-796X
Chad A MirkinInternational Institute for Nanotechnology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. chadnano@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-7627

Funding

Project 3: Spherical Nucleic Acids as Immunotherapeutic Agents for Prostate CancerU54CA199091 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MIRKIN, CHAD A. · 2015 to 2019
$11.7M
Chemistry of Life Processes Predoctoral Training ProgramT32GM105538 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI KELLEHER, NEIL L · 2013 to 2022
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA199091NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM105538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Only a tiny fraction of the nanomedicine-design space has been explored, owing to the structural complexity of nanomedicines and the lack of relevant high-throughput synthesis and analysis methods. Here, we report a methodology for determining structure-activity relationships and design rules for spherical nucleic acids (SNAs) functioning as cancer-vaccine candidates. First, we identified ~1,000 candidate SNAs on the basis of reasonable ranges for 11 design parameters that can be systematically and independently varied to optimize SNA performance. Second, we developed a high-throughput method for making SNAs at the picomolar scale in a 384-well format, and used a mass spectrometry assay to rapidly measure SNA immune activation. Third, we used machine learning to quantitatively model SNA immune activation and identify the minimum number of SNAs needed to capture optimum structure-activity relationships for a given SNA library. Our methodology is general, can reduce the number of nanoparticles that need to be tested by an order of magnitude, and could serve as a screening tool for the development of nanoparticle therapeutics.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNanomedicineAlkaline PhosphataseAnimalsCell LineHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansLiposomesNanoparticlesNucleic AcidsOligonucleotidesStructure-Activity RelationshipAlkaline PhosphataseLiposomesNucleic AcidsOligonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID30952978
PMCPMC6452897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.