ArticleNature communications2019
The neural computation of inconsistent choice behavior.
Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid changes in risk attitudes originate from Bayesian inference on parietal magnitude representations.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- The Trembling Hand Unraveled: Motor Dynamics and Choice Inconsistency.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Early versus late noise differentially enhances or degrades context-dependent choice.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A Computational Analysis of the Effect of Hard Choices on the Individuation of Values.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Pre-acquired Functional Connectivity Predicts Choice Inconsistency.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Decomposing decision-making in preschoolers: Making decisions under ambiguity versus risk.PloS one · 2024Article
- Divisive normalization is an efficient code for multivariate Pareto-distributed environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- On the reliability of individual economic rationality measurements.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022Review
- Does Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Damage Really Increase Impulsiveness? Delay and Probability Discounting in Patients with Focal Lesions.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2021Article
- A Preferential Role for Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Assessing "the Value of the Whole" in Multiattribute Object Evaluation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Responses to Heartbeats in Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Contribute to Subjective Preference-Based Decisions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Single-Dimensional Human Brain Signals for Two-Dimensional Economic Choice Options.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Focal stimulation of the temporoparietal junction improves rationality in prosocial decision-making.Scientific reports · 2020Observational
- Experimentally revealed stochastic preferences for multicomponent choice options.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2020Article
- Fear-induced increases in loss aversion are linked to increased neural negative-value coding.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020Article
- Stochastic representation decision theory: How probabilities and values are entangled dual characteristics in cognitive processes.PloS one · 2020Article
- An Integrative and Mechanistic Model of Impaired Belief Updating in Schizophrenia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans are often inconsistent (irrational) when choosing among simple bundles of goods, even without any particular changes to framing or context. However, the neural computations that give rise to such inconsistencies are still unknown. Similar to sensory perception and motor output, we propose that a substantial component of inconsistent behavior is due to variability in the neural computation of value. Here, we develop a novel index that measures the severity of inconsistency of each choice, enabling us to directly trace its neural correlates. We find that the BOLD signal in the vmPFC, ACC, and PCC is correlated with the severity of inconsistency on each trial and with the subjective value of the chosen alternative. This suggests that deviations from rational choice arise in the regions responsible for value computation. We offer a computational model of how variability in value computation is a source of inconsistent choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.