Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30952627›Full record

ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2019

One hundred years of

Santiago Nahuel Villegas

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Drosophila as a Model for Metastasis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Drosophila melanogaster as a Model System for Human Glioblastoma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cellular Pathogenesis of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Insights FromFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Santiago Nahuel VillegasInstituto de Neurociencias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) and Universidad Miguel Hernandez (UMH), Campus de Sant Joan, Apartado 18, 03550 Sant Joan, Alicante, Spain svillegas@umh.es.ORCID 0000-0002-2972-5131
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When Mary Stark first described the presence of tumours in the fruit fly

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomedical ResearchDrosophila melanogasterDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGenes, Tumor SuppressorHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyNeoplasmsOncogenesCancerDrosophilaMary StarkMetastasis

Identifiers

PMID30952627
PMCPMC6505481
OpenAlexW2927504403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.