ReviewRheumatic diseases clinics of North America2019
Using Health Information Technology to Support Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatology.
Review in Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opportunities and challenges of digital health in rheumatology according to patients and professionals: a cross-sectional study.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Preferences regarding technology to unobtrusively monitor symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative study using focus group discussions.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- PostRegional anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Article
- Collecting patient-reported outcomes via the COTIDIANA smartphone app: a prospective validity study.RMD open · 2025Article
- Toward Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Patients Undergoing a Hip or Knee Replacement: Focus Group and Interview Study With Surgeons.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2023Article
- Monitoring chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal diseases mixing virtual and face-to-face assessments-Results of the digireuma study.PLOS digital health · 2022Article
- The racial/ethnic and sociocultural aspects of the pandemic in rheumatology.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2021Review
- Understanding flare in axial spondyloarthritis: novel insights from daily self-reported flare experience.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2021Article
- Patient Perspectives on a Digital Mobile Health Application for RA.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2021Article
- Digital crowdsourcing: unleashing its power in rheumatology.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2020Article
- Acceptance, Usage, and Barriers of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Among German Rheumatologists: Survey Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Technology can help health care providers understand their patients' experience of illness in a way that was previously impossible. Experience in using health information technology (IT) to capture this information through PROs within rheumatology suggests that careful attention to human centered design, including detailed workflow planning, consideration of patient and physician burden, integration into the health IT ecosystem, and delivering information to the right person at the right time are all important. Technology applications must be tested in diverse health systems and populations to ensure they are simple to interpret, useful for clinical decision making and effective in impacting outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.