Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30952007›Full record

ArticleWater research2019

Sequential drinking water sampling as a tool for evaluating lead in flint, Michigan.

Darren A Lytle, Michael R Schock, Kory Wait, Kelly Cahalan, Valerie Bosscher, Andrea Porter, Miguel Del Toral

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Darren A LytleU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ORD, NRMRL, WSWRD, TTEB, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA. Electronic address: lytle.darren@epa.gov.
Michael R SchockU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ORD, NRMRL, WSWRD, TTEB, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.
Kory WaitU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ORD, NRMRL, WSWRD, TTEB, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.
Kelly CahalanU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ORD, NRMRL, WSWRD, TTEB, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.
Valerie BosscherU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Ground Water & Drinking Water Branch, 77 Jackson Blvd, Chicago, IL 60604, USA.
Andrea PorterU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Ground Water & Drinking Water Branch, 77 Jackson Blvd, Chicago, IL 60604, USA.
Miguel Del ToralU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Ground Water & Drinking Water Branch, 77 Jackson Blvd, Chicago, IL 60604, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USIllinois Environmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eliminating the sources of human lead exposure is an ongoing public health goal. Identifying the make-up of household plumbing and service line material type is important for many reasons including understanding lead release sources and mechanisms, targeting locations for lead service line (LSL) removal, and assessing the effectiveness of lead remediation strategies. As part of the response to Flint, Michigan's drinking water lead public health crisis, a return to their original drinking water source (Lake Huron) and an increase in orthophosphate dose was implemented in late 2015. In 2016, EPA performed multiple rounds of sequential or "profiling" water sampling to evaluate corrosion control effectiveness and identify lead sources in homes and service lines, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of corrosion control treatment with time on the different plumbing components. The results showed that lead levels, including high lead levels likely associated with particles, decreased with time in homes sampled during the 11-month evaluation period. Although sequential sampling indicated that brass fittings, brass fixtures, and galvanized pipes were lead sources, LSLs were the greatest source of lead when present. Following the removal of LSLs, the total mass of lead contributed to the drinking water decreased by 86% on average.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalHumansLeadMichiganWater SupplyDrinking WaterLeadWater Pollutants, ChemicalDrinking waterLeadOrthophosphatesequential samples

Identifiers

PMID30952007
PMCPMC7350769
OpenAlexW2925015440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.