ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2019
The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring perspectives of interest-holders on the use of health and genomic data from deceased participants in research: An updated systematic review.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Pooled it
- International policies guiding the selection, analysis, and clinical management of secondary findings from genomic sequencing: A systematic review.American journal of human genetics · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Pooled it
- Six years' experience with LipidSeq: clinical and research learnings from a hybrid, targeted sequencing panel for dyslipidemias.BMC medical genomics · 2020Trial
- Recommendations for return of secondary genomic findings in observational cohort studies.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy consensus statement on IEI molecular diagnosis.Journal of human immunity · 2026Review
- Automated reanalysis of genomic data for rare disease diagnostics at scale.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Co-development of a genetic care pathway for ALS: real-world perspectives from the North of England.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Automating genomic reanalysis: perspectives of people living with, or impacted by, a genetic, rare or undiagnosed condition.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Mainzelliste: Ten years of pseudonymization, record linkage, and informed consent management.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- According to Which Criteria Should the Undiagnosed Diseases Network's Value Be Assessed?AMA journal of ethics · 2025Article
- Sustainability in translational genomics research with undiagnosed patients: What is it, why do we need it, and how do we do it?Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025Article
- Appropriate time interval to update ambiguous genetic diagnosis in inherited arrhythmogenic syndromes.iScience · 2025Article
- The expanding global genomics landscape: Converging priorities from national genomics programs.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Ethical, legal, and policy dimensions and contentions for reanalysis and reinterpretation of clinical genetic testing results.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Canadian College of Medical Geneticists: clinical practice advisory document - responsibility to recontact for reinterpretation of clinical genetic testing.Journal of medical genetics · 2024Article
- Actionable Variants of Unknown Significance in Inherited Arrhythmogenic Syndromes: A Further Step Forward in Genetic Diagnosis.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Reanalysis of genomic data in rare disease: current practice and attitudes among Australian clinical and laboratory genetics services.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Reanalysis of genomic data, how do we do it now and what if we automate it? A qualitative study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Experiences of pediatric cancer patients (age 12-18 years) with extensive germline sequencing for cancer predisposition: a qualitative study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The evidence base supporting genetic and genomic sequence-variant interpretations is continuously evolving. An inherent consequence is that a variant's clinical significance might be reinterpreted over time as new evidence emerges regarding its pathogenicity or lack thereof. This raises ethical, legal, and financial issues as to whether there is a responsibility to recontact research participants to provide updates on reinterpretations of variants after the initial analysis. There has been discussion concerning the extent of this obligation in the context of both research and clinical care. Although clinical recommendations have begun to emerge, guidance is lacking on the responsibilities of researchers to inform participants of reinterpreted results. To respond, an American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) workgroup developed this position statement, which was approved by the ASHG Board in November 2018. The workgroup included representatives from the National Society of Genetic Counselors, the Canadian College of Medical Genetics, and the Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors. The final statement includes twelve position statements that were endorsed or supported by the following organizations: Genetic Alliance, European Society of Human Genetics, Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors, American Association of Anthropological Genetics, Executive Committee of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, Canadian College of Medical Genetics, Human Genetics Society of Australasia, and National Society of Genetic Counselors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.