Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30951554›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Evaluation of the comparative accuracy of the complement fixation test, Western blot and five enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for serodiagnosis of glanders.

Mandy Carolina Elschner, Karine Laroucau, Harisankar Singha, Bhupendra Nath Tripathi, Muhammad Saqib, Ian Gardner, Sheetal Saini, Subodh Kumar, Hosny El-Adawy, Falk Melzer and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Isolation and Purification of theArchives of Razi Institute · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and validation of a chemiluminescent western blot assay for glanders (Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Mandy Carolina ElschnerInstitute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5705-1659
Karine LaroucauParis Est University, Animal Health Laboratory, EU-Reference Laboratory for Glanders, Maisons Alfort Cedex, France.
Harisankar SinghaIndian Council of Agricultural Research-National Research Centre on Equines, Hisar, India.
Bhupendra Nath TripathiIndian Council of Agricultural Research-National Research Centre on Equines, Hisar, India.
Muhammad SaqibDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Ian GardnerDepartment of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, UPEI, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
Sheetal SainiIndian Council of Agricultural Research-National Research Centre on Equines, Hisar, India.
Subodh KumarDefence Research and Development Establishment, Microbiology Division, Gwalior, India.
Hosny El-AdawyInstitute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Jena, Germany.
Falk MelzerInstitute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Jena, Germany.
Iahtasham KhanSection of Epidemiology and Public Health, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Jhang, Pakistan.
Praveen MalikChaudhary Charan Singh, National Institute of Animal Health, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Baghpat, India.
Carola Sauter-LouisInstitute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Heinrich NeubauerInstitute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Jena, Germany.
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DENational Research Centre on Equines · INDefence Research and Development Establishment · INÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRKafrelsheikh University · EGUniversity of Faisalabad · PKUniversity of Prince Edward Island · CAUniversity of Veterinary and Animal Sciences · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glanders is a zoonotic contagious disease of equids caused by Burkholderia (B.) mallei. Serodiagnosis of the disease is challenging because of false-positive and false-negative test results. The accuracy of the complement fixation test (CFT) which is prescribed for international trade by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), five ELISAs and a Western blot (WB) were compared for serodiagnosis of glanders using sera from 3,000 glanders-free and 254 glanderous equids. Four ELISA tests are based on recombinant antigens (TssA, TssB, BimA and Hcp1), the IDVet ELISA is based on a semi-purified fraction of B. mallei and WB makes use of a purified LPS-containing B. mallei-antigen. Sensitivity and specificity of tests were estimated using cut-off values recommended by the test developers. The WB and all ELISAs, except BimA, were significantly more specific than the CFT. ELISAs based on TssA, TssB, and BimA antigens had significantly lower sensitivity compared to CFT while the sensitivities of the Hcp1-ELISA, the IDVet-ELISA and the WB did not differ significantly from that of the CFT. Given their comparable sensitivities and specificities, the CFT (98.0%, 96.4%), the WB (96.8%, 99.4%), the Hcp1-ELISA (95.3%, 99.6%) and the IDVet-ELISA (92.5%, 99.5%) should be further developed to meet OIE requirements.

Indexed as

Blotting, WesternBurkholderia malleiComplement Fixation TestsAnimalsAntigens, BacterialEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGlandersHorsesAntigens, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID30951554
PMCPMC6450644
OpenAlexW2930819474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.