Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30951538›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Symptom-Checklist-K-9: Norm values and factorial structure in a representative German sample.

Katja Petrowski, Bjarne Schmalbach, Sören Kliem, Andreas Hinz, Elmar Brähler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The YSQ-R: Predictive Validity and Comparison to the Short and Long Form Young Schema Questionnaire.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katja PetrowskiMedical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Mainz, Department Psychosomatic Medicine, Mainz, Germany.
Bjarne SchmalbachMedical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Mainz, Department Psychosomatic Medicine, Mainz, Germany.
Sören KliemCriminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony, Germany.
Andreas HinzUniversity of Leipzig, Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig, Germany.
Elmar BrählerUniversity of Leipzig, Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SCL-K-9 is the latest short version of the multidimensional Symptom-Checklist 90-R. Up to now, its psychometric properties have not been clarified sufficiently as the nine items have not yet been presented exclusively in a representative sample. Therefore, psychometric properties, model fit values as well as norm-values were analyzed.

methodsFor the sample, N = 2,507 participants aged 14 to 92, n = 1,379 women and n = 1,128 men, and a mean age of 48.79 (SD = 17.91), were selected from the general population by random-route sampling. Confirmatory factor analyses applying full information maximum likelihood (FIML) tested the model fit. The reliability estimations and effect sizes were reported.

resultsThe items' discriminative power ranged between .49 to .65, and the Cronbach's Alpha was α = .87, which stands for a good reliability of the SCL-K-9. Norm values as well as gender and age specificities were presented in this section. The CFA with all nine items loading on one latent factor resulted in a good fit. There was evidence of invariance across age and gender groups. SUMMARY: Based on these results, the short screening version SCL-K-9 of the Symptom-Checklist 90-R showed good reliability and good model fit; specific norm values could be determined. Further studies should evaluate the usefulness of the standardization in clinical samples.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyArmDepressionEmotionsFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID30951538
PMCPMC6450622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.