Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30951099›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2019

Genome-wide Association Mapping and Prediction of Adult Stage

Quddoos H Muqaddasi, Yusheng Zhao, Bernd Rodemann, Jörg Plieske, Martin W Ganal, Marion S Röder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Quddoos H Muqaddasi
Yusheng Zhao
Bernd Rodemann
Jörg Plieske
Martin W Ganal
Marion S Röder

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

blotch (STB) caused by the fungus is a devastating foliar disease of wheat ( L.) that can lead to substantial yield losses. Quantitative genetic resistance has been proposed as a durable strategy for STB control. In this study, we dissected the genetic basis of STB infection in 371 European wheat varieties based on 35k and 90k single nucleotide polymorphism marker arrays. The phenotypic data analyses suggested that large genetic variance exists for STB infection with a broad-sense heritability of 0.78. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) propose the highly quantitative nature of STB infection with potential associations on chromosomes 1A, 1B, 2D, 4A, 5A, 6A, 6D, 7A, and 7B. Increased marker density in GWAS by combining markers from both arrays helped to detect additional markers explaining increased genotypic variance. Linkage disequilibrium analyses revealed genes with a possible role in disease resistance. The potential of genomic prediction (GP) assessed via two models accounting for additive effects and additive plus epistatic interactions among the loci suggested the possibility of genomic selection for improved STB resistance. Genomic prediction results also indicated that the higher-order epistatic interactions are not abundant and that both marker platforms are equally suitable for GP of STB infection. Our results provide further understanding of the quantitative genetic nature of STB infection, serve as a resource for marker-assisted breeding, and highlight the potential of genomic selection for improved STB resistance.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantAscomycotaDisease ResistanceGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyLinkage DisequilibriumPlant DiseasesTriticumGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID30951099
PMCPMC12809923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.