Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30951092›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2019

Association Analysis of Three Diverse Rice (

Trevis D Huggins, Ming-Hsuan Chen, Robert G Fjellstrom, Aaron K Jackson, Anna M McClung, Jeremy D Edwards

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Coordinated Suite of Wild-Introgression Lines inFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Trevis D Huggins
Ming-Hsuan Chen
Robert G Fjellstrom
Aaron K Jackson
Anna M McClung
Jeremy D Edwards
Dale Bumpers National Rice Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rice ( L.) end-use cooking quality is vital for producers and billions of consumers worldwide. Grain quality is a complex trait with interacting genetic and environmental factors. Deciphering the complex genetic architecture associated with grain quality provides essential information for improved breeding strategies to enhance desirable traits that are stable across variable climatic and environmental conditions. In this study, genome-wide association (GWA) analysis of three rice diversity panels, the USDA rice core subset (1364 accessions), the minicore (MC) (173 accessions after removing non-), and the high density rice array-MC (HDMC) (383 accessions), with simple sequence repeats, single nucleotide polymorphic markers, or both, revealed large- and small-effect loci associated with known genes and previously uncharacterized genomic regions. Clustering of the significant regions in the GWA results suggests that multiple grain quality traits are inherited together. The 11 novel candidate loci for grain quality traits and the seven candidates for grain chalk identified are involved in the starch biosynthesis pathway. This study highlights the intricate pleiotropic relationships that exist in complex genotype-phenotypic associations and gives a greater insight into effective breeding strategies for grain quality improvement.

Indexed as

Edible GrainFood QualityGenetic PleiotropyGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyOryza

Identifiers

PMID30951092
PMCPMC12962390
OpenAlexW2901430737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.