Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30950853›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in infectious diseases2019

Monoclonal antibody-based therapies for bacterial infections.

Michael P Motley, Kasturi Banerjee, Bettina C Fries

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A multifunctional anti-O-Antigen human monoclonal antibody protects againstProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance: Innovative Drugs in Antibacterial Research.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Infectious Diseases.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2025
    Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael P MotleyInfectious Disease Division, Department of Medicine.
Kasturi BanerjeeInfectious Disease Division, Department of Medicine.
Bettina C FriesInfectious Disease Division, Department of Medicine.
Stony Brook University · USNorthport VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Optimization of therapeutic mAbs to carbapenem resistant Klebsiella clone ST258I01BX003741 · VA · NORTHPORT VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI FRIES, BETTINA · 2019 to 2025
–
BLRD VA I01 BX003741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review highlights recent developments in the development of monoclonal antibodies to treat bacterial disease, including preclinical advances and the status of current clinical trials. RECENT

findingsMonoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy is becoming increasingly promising in the infectious disease field. Though bacterial exotoxins continue to be a mainstay of mAb targets, searches for protein targets on the surface of bacteria have uncovered new mechanisms of antibody-mediated action against bacteria. Additionally, surveys of the polysaccharide serotype prevalence among antibiotic-resistant bacterial populations have yielded opportunities to leverage human selective pressures to our clinical advantage. Several mAb candidates are progressing through clinical development with great promise, especially those with structures altered to provide maximum benefit. Although other clinical trials have recently proved unsuccessful, these failures and lessons from immune profiling provide opportunities to understand how vulnerabilities of certain targets may change in different disease states. SUMMARY: Despite the hurdles of identifying effective targets and understanding how mAbs provide protection within different infections, we show that the progress made in these fields is a positive indication of mAbs becoming more widely accepted as the future for treating bacterial infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalBacterial InfectionsClinical Trials as TopicDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansImmunotherapyAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID30950853
PMCPMC7050834
OpenAlexW2938893965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.