ReviewJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2019
Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze Speech-Evoked Neurophysiological Responses.
Review in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neural correlates and predictors of speech and language development in infants at elevated likelihood for autism: a systematic review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- Objective discrimination of bimodal speech using frequency following responses.Hearing research · 2023Article
- Perceptual warping exposes categorical representations for speech in human brainstem responses.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Cortical-brainstem interplay during speech perception in older adults with and without hearing loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Brainstem speech encoding is dynamically shaped online by fluctuations in cortical α state.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Development of executive function-relevant skills is related to both neural structure and function in infants.Developmental science · 2022Article
- Article
- Auditory Evoked Potentials in Communication Disorders: An Overview of Past, Present, and Future.Seminars in hearing · 2022Review
- Implementation of Machine Learning on Human Frequency-Following Responses: A Tutorial.Seminars in hearing · 2022Review
- Translational Applications of Machine Learning in Auditory Electrophysiology.Seminars in hearing · 2022Review
- Article
- The emergence of idiosyncratic patterns in the frequency-following response during the first year of life.JASA express letters · 2022Article
- Neural-Behavioral Relation in Phonetic Discrimination Modulated by Language Background.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Lifelong Tone Language Experience does not Eliminate Deficits in Neural Encoding of Pitch in Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2021Article
- The neural processing of pitch accents in continuous speech.Neuropsychologia · 2021Article
- Infants' neural speech discrimination predicts individual differences in grammar ability at 6 years of age and their risk of developing speech-language disorders.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2021Article
- Neural tracking of the speech envelope is differentially modulated by attention and language experience.Brain and language · 2021Article
- Rapid Enhancement of Subcortical Neural Responses to Sine-Wave Speech.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response.Nature communications · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose Speech-evoked neurophysiological responses are often collected to answer clinically and theoretically driven questions concerning speech and language processing. Here, we highlight the practical application of machine learning (ML)-based approaches to analyzing speech-evoked neurophysiological responses. Method Two categories of ML-based approaches are introduced: decoding models, which generate a speech stimulus output using the features from the neurophysiological responses, and encoding models, which use speech stimulus features to predict neurophysiological responses. In this review, we focus on (a) a decoding model classification approach, wherein speech-evoked neurophysiological responses are classified as belonging to 1 of a finite set of possible speech events (e.g., phonological categories), and (b) an encoding model temporal response function approach, which quantifies the transformation of a speech stimulus feature to continuous neural activity. Results We illustrate the utility of the classification approach to analyze early electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to Mandarin lexical tone categories from a traditional experimental design, and to classify EEG responses to English phonemes evoked by natural continuous speech (i.e., an audiobook) into phonological categories (plosive, fricative, nasal, and vowel). We also demonstrate the utility of temporal response function to predict EEG responses to natural continuous speech from acoustic features. Neural metrics from the 3 examples all exhibit statistically significant effects at the individual level. Conclusion We propose that ML-based approaches can complement traditional analysis approaches to analyze neurophysiological responses to speech signals and provide a deeper understanding of natural speech and language processing using ecologically valid paradigms in both typical and clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.