ReviewJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2019
Essential Statistical Concepts for Research in Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences.
Review in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Auditory Experience, Speech Sound Production Growth, and Early Literacy in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2022Article
- Statistical Considerations for Analyzing Ecological Momentary Assessment Data.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Review
- Assessing Language in Unstructured Conversation in People With Aphasia: Methods, Psychometric Integrity, Normative Data, and Comparison to a Structured Narrative Task.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Passive case detection for canine visceral leishmaniasis control in urban Brazil: Determinants of population uptake.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Comparison of In-Situ and Retrospective Self-Reports on Assessing Hearing Aid Outcomes.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2020Observational
- Effect of level on spectral-ripple detection threshold for listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- The Evolution of Statistical Methods in Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Review
- Comparisons of the Sensitivity and Reliability of Multiple Measures of Listening Effort.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose Clinicians depend on the accuracy of research in the speech, language, and hearing sciences to improve assessment and treatment of patients with communication disorders. Although this work has contributed to great advances in clinical care, common statistical misconceptions remain, which deserve closer inspection in the field. Challenges in applying and interpreting traditional statistical methods with behavioral data from humans have led to difficulties with replication and reproducibility in other allied scientific fields, including psychology and medicine. The importance of research in our fields of study for advancing science and clinical care for our patients means that the choices of statistical methods can have far-reaching, real-world implications. Method The goal of this article is to provide an overview of fundamental statistical concepts and methods that are used in the speech, language, and hearing sciences. Results We reintroduce basic statistical terms such as the p value and effect size, as well as recommended procedures for model selection and multiple comparisons. Conclusions Research in the speech, language, and hearing sciences can have a profound positive impact on the lives of individuals with communication disorders, but the validity of scientific findings in our fields is enhanced when data are analyzed using sound statistical methods. Misunderstanding or misinterpretation of basic statistical principles may erode public trust in research findings. Recommendations for practices that can help minimize the likelihood of errors in statistical inference are provided. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7849223.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.