Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30950735›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2019

Patterns of Recovery From Aphasia in the First 2 Weeks After Stroke.

Stephen M Wilson, Dana K Eriksson, Temre H Brandt, Sarah M Schneck, Jillian M Lucanie, Annie S Burchfield, Sara Charney, Ian A Quillen, Michael de Riesthal, Howard S Kirshner and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Insights gained over 60 years on factors shaping post-stroke aphasia recovery: A commentary on Vignolo (1964).Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Recovery from aphasia in the first year after stroke.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Language Mapping in Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen M WilsonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Dana K ErikssonDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Temre H BrandtDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Sarah M SchneckDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Jillian M LucanieDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Annie S BurchfieldDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Sara CharneyDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Ian A QuillenDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Michael de RiesthalDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Howard S KirshnerDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Pélagie M BeesonDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Leslie RitterDepartment of Neurology, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Chelsea S KidwellDepartment of Neurology, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USUniversity of Arizona · USBanner - University Medical Center Tucson · US

Funding

Neural Correlates of Recovery from Aphasia After StrokeR01DC013270 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Stephen M Wilson, Michael R de Riesthal · 2014 to 2026
$6.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Recovery from aphasia after stroke has a decelerating trajectory, with the greatest gains taking place early and the slope of change decreasing over time. Despite its importance, little is known regarding evolution of language function in the early postonset period. The goal of this study was to characterize the dynamics and nature of recovery of language function in the acute and early subacute phases of stroke. Method Twenty-one patients with aphasia were evaluated every 2-3 days for the first 15 days after onset of acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Language function was assessed at each time point with the Quick Aphasia Battery (Wilson, Eriksson, Schneck, & Lucanie, 2018), which yields an overall summary score and a multidimensional profile of 7 different language domains. Results On a 10-point scale, overall language function improved by a mean of 1.07 points per week, confidence interval [0.46, 1.71], with 19 of 21 patients showing positive changes. The trajectory of recovery was approximately linear over this time period. There was significant variability across patients, and patients with more impaired language function at Day 2 poststroke experienced greater improvements over the subsequent 2 weeks. Patterns of recovery differed across language domains, with consistent improvements in word finding, grammatical construction, repetition, and reading, but less consistent improvements in word comprehension and sentence comprehension. Conclusion Overall language function typically improves substantially and steadily during the first 2 weeks after stroke, driven mostly by recovery of expressive language. Information on the trajectory of early recovery will increase the accuracy of prognoses and establish baseline expectations against which to evaluate the efficacy of interventions. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7811876.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAphasiaFemaleHumansLanguage TestsMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionStrokeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID30950735
PMCPMC6802900
OpenAlexW2922420198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.